<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with ubuntu sdk]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with ubuntu sdk]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/tags/ubuntu sdk</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:58:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forums.ubports.com/tags/ubuntu sdk.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2017 14:02:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Future of the Ubuntu SDK]]></title><description><![CDATA[It's probably not a problem, and if it is we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. See the following:
[image: 1491764558565-upload-7edd56ae-e5b6-4462-a5be-025c90400b6c.png]
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/topic/180/future-of-the-ubuntu-sdk</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/topic/180/future-of-the-ubuntu-sdk</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[UniSuperBox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2017 14:02:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A vision of where to go after Ubuntu Touch&#x27;s death]]></title><description><![CDATA[@Andreas-Pokorny
Thank you for providing further informations about Mir. I wasn't aware that Canonical dropped the libhybris integration. And thanks for taking care of that!
Snaps
Point by point:


It's probably easier for me to explain with an example. The LibreOffice snap in the U.Store uses the "Home" interface, which was meant to be transitional. Now that Canonical has no plan for Ubuntu Personal, could we expect similar interfaces to be "standard"? Could they break (in terms of UX and security) the current UT/UP security model, which relies on ContentHub for content sharing?


Huh, when I used "content" I was referring to files, document, or more generically data. I wasn't aware of such interface.


Yeah, that was my fear. The only example I found for adding new interfaces is this one. My impression is that Snaps have been designed with a strong centralization, afaiu.


]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/topic/170/a-vision-of-where-to-go-after-ubuntu-touch-s-death</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/topic/170/a-vision-of-where-to-go-after-ubuntu-touch-s-death</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sverzegnassi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 07:28:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>