<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[portar telegram desktop]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">could you port the ubuntu desktop telegram application to our mobile format?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/topic/3835/portar-telegram-desktop</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 11:13:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forums.ubports.com/topic/3835.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:50:08 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to portar telegram desktop on Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:20:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Flohack said in <a href="/post/28840">portar telegram desktop</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/guru" aria-label="Profile: guru">@<bdi>guru</bdi></a> Well its a standard in Twitter, Facebook, Telegram and other services, even in this forum. Its like the hashtag #, and like other things change over time. I see no issue with that. Human mind can adopt to this, understanding that @xyzvwu does not mean an email address.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Flohack, reading your reply again, I see that you didn't got my point: While <code>flohack@host.domain</code> expresses what it means "flohack at host.domain" (flohack auf/am Rechner host.domain), the term <code>@ flohack</code> "at flohack" (auf/am flohack) is just nonsense. Perhaps the idea is expressing "to flohack", but AT (the symbol @) is not the same as TO. This is just a broken idea, even if it's called a standard. Who invented this, should have used another symbol, like <code>&gt;flohack</code> and not <code>@flohack</code>. You got me?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/28904</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/28904</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[guru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:20:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to portar telegram desktop on Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:26:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Everybody is free to use such broken „standard“, or not to use it. I will not. And anybody who use it with my name might concider that I will ignore such message addressed aparently to me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/28893</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/28893</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[guru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:26:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to portar telegram desktop on Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:41:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/guru" aria-label="Profile: guru">@<bdi>guru</bdi></a> Well its a standard in Twitter, Facebook, Telegram and other services, even in this forum. Its like the hashtag #, and like other things change over time. I see no issue with that. Human mind can adopt to this, understanding that @xyzvwu does not mean an email address.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/28840</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/28840</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[flohack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:41:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to portar telegram desktop on Thu, 20 Feb 2020 18:55:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/domubpkm" aria-label="Profile: domubpkm">@<bdi>domubpkm</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/28793">portar telegram desktop</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/flohack" aria-label="Profile: Flohack">@<bdi>Flohack</bdi></a> Enough annoying.. Furthermore, it does not seem possible at the moment to use the username in @ to contact (only a known tel). Is it?   (missing <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/username" aria-label="Profile: username">@<bdi>username</bdi></a> parameter from the contact plug).</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Since ages I use email (IIRC since 1992) and always the <code>@</code> symbol was reserved to express <code>user @ host.domain</code> and this was well done and thought, because it means <code>the user foo at host bar</code>.</p>
<p dir="auto">Nowadays someone, bad thought, invented the style <code>@ user</code> to direct the phrasing to someone or to speak about someone. But this is bad expressed, because it should be <code>to user foo I say this and this</code> and not <code>at user foo I say this and this</code>.</p>
<p dir="auto">Any chance that we could get rid of <code>@ user</code>?</p>
<p dir="auto">matthias</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/28825</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/28825</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[guru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 18:55:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to portar telegram desktop on Thu, 20 Feb 2020 02:34:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/flohack" aria-label="Profile: Flohack">@<bdi>Flohack</bdi></a> Enough annoying.. Furthermore, it does not seem possible at the moment to use the username in @ to contact (only a known tel). Is it?   (missing <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/username" aria-label="Profile: username">@<bdi>username</bdi></a> parameter from the contact plug).</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/28793</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/28793</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[domubpkm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 02:34:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to portar telegram desktop on Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:20:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/domubpkm" aria-label="Profile: domubpkm">@<bdi>domubpkm</bdi></a> The fast scroll we tried to import from address book app, but it seems broken, also in the address book itself. No idea if we can fix it</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/28777</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/28777</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[flohack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:20:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to portar telegram desktop on Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:30:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/flohack" aria-label="Profile: Flohack">@<bdi>Flohack</bdi></a> TELEports is a very good app indeed.<img src="https://forums.ubports.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f44d.png?v=60240fe800f" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--+1" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="👍" alt="👍" /><br />
I hope that this mechanism <a href="https://gitlab.com/ubports/apps/teleports/issues/130" rel="nofollow ugc">https://gitlab.com/ubports/apps/teleports/issues/130</a> which seems essential to me, will come soon enough.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/28746</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/28746</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[domubpkm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:30:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to portar telegram desktop on Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:01:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/flohack" aria-label="Profile: Flohack">@<bdi>Flohack</bdi></a> Thank you very much for the answer, I already have teleports installed.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/28745</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/28745</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ricardo65]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:01:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to portar telegram desktop on Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:59:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Sorry that is not so easy as it sounds:</p>
<ul>
<li>Desktop version comes with a lot of dependencies that are not directly available for building in UT</li>
<li>No integration for notifications</li>
<li>No secret chats</li>
<li>No file exchange and attachments</li>
<li>No audio recording/playback</li>
<li>No contacts/addressbook integration</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">All of the above would need to be fixed, but thats why we have <a href="https://open-store.io/app/teleports.ubports" rel="nofollow ugc">https://open-store.io/app/teleports.ubports</a> - Its the project we are actively developing for and which will get all the features from desktop after some time.</p>
<p dir="auto">Do you really want</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/28741</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/28741</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[flohack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:59:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>