look like the mascot and the forum name are the same element/image

Yes same for me, told you, it took me long, and maybe a "misclick" to find this ^^

It's about having common and easy ways to get access from the forum to the website vice versa.

@3T_Ed Not sure I follow you... Figma link is now working, see if it answers your request.

I'm just curious as to what progress ...

Mostly interviewing, designing, programming, and debating.

... and your thoughts in sketches as a continuous work in progress (creative, design, usability, content/catchphrases, etc.)

Funny, I find it as an interview question . (The sketch process was done a few weeks ago, and removed it due to advantage reason)

I answered that question, but I found it too vulnerable to expose my process, so I erased it. But you won't go empty-handed. >>> The general plan was to bundle all current resources and community needs to newcomers, with a vibrant attitude and, a clean/clear social purpose. I see the process as pure sale (as we discus before)

Website traffic is X. Every month, a small portion of the visitors' sticks. We have meaningful idea to convey others to join something big. As more we turn visitors to contributors, the more community is becoming productive and more teams are formed organically.

Soon, with the brand book release, I will elaborate more details ...

once in the forum it is no longer possible to reach the website

You can, by clicking on the "yumi" logo next to "UBports Forum" in the top bar menu.

Not quite obvious, it took me long time to find this...

No I don't think it's only button-related, it's about having common and easy ways to get access from the forum to the website visa versa.

The link you provided in your latest reply does not seem to work either (the figma.com URL). I'm just curious as to what progress has been made and your thoughts in sketches as a continuous work in progress (creative, design, usability, content/catch phrases, etc). I tend to look at the website through the eyes of a newcomer which may differ from the way in which some members have grown accustomed to.

But I think what he tried to say that the subdomains need to have go back button (?)

where is easy to enter but difficult to exit

@Aury88 Are you sure you talking about the forum?

should let the user easily navigate in any "direction" inside the project

Beside SDK, Documents and Forum, what other subdomains/pages do you find important to navigate to insistently? (within the UBports domain ofc)

the same should also apply to the documentation page, another dead end section

Basically you suggest to have a full navigation menu on ubports sub domain? or just return to home (to website/forum) button?

The site has MANY entrance points to the forum on many subjects and conversations.

I'm not talking about the entrance points to the forum but about the entrance point from the forum to the website.

I don't think have to search a conversation in the forum to discover the main website or a particular webpage in the project website is a good approach...and I still think this make look like the forum something isolated from the rest of the project...a sort of a dead end where is easy to enter but difficult to exit while it should let the user easily navigate in any "direction" inside the project and easily reach the desired webpage in the project webpage.

the same should also apply to the documentation page, another dead end section

Sure, three billion devices run Java. But did you know that 44 devices run Ubuntu Touch? By the way, if your device is not listed here, you might be interested to learn how to make the 45th Ubuntu Touch port!

from https://devices.ubuntu-touch.io/
It should be probably changed to something more appropriate.

sorry for re-opening this discussion

The project isn't done yet, all is cool

it does seem almost a thing in itself while in reality the forum is an integral part of the community and the project.

The site has MANY entrance points to the forum on many subjects and conversations.

JAVA compatible?

Thank you for paying attention

is ubports build with JAVA

If so, it should be spelled 'built with JAVA'.

It's currently phrased like a command: Hey you! Build with JAVA!
If it's intended to inform people that UT was built using JAVA, that's a different tense of the verb 'to build' and should be spelled accordingly.

and have a pixel-perfect eye

It bothers me every time I look at the designs. I think the search icon :magnifying_glass_tilted_left: in header menu is too close to the installer button. I'm no designer, I'm just thinking out loud.