<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Support for F2FS file system?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F2FS" rel="nofollow ugc">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F2FS</a><br />
Seems like this kernel level file system is widely used in the Android world and can offer quite significant speed improvements* (and other advantages) over EXT4 that is currently used in UT.</p>
<p dir="auto">*<a href="https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=linux-58-filesystems&amp;num=1" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=linux-58-filesystems&amp;num=1</a><br />
Edit: also: <a href="https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=linux-50-filesystems&amp;num=4" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=linux-50-filesystems&amp;num=4</a><br />
(While overall performance seems to highly depend on the benchmark, application start-up time measured seems significantly better with F2FS, which would be probably noticeable on UT, which IMHO suffers from relatively slow application startup.)</p>
<p dir="auto">Has this been considered?</p>
<p dir="auto">Edit: Hmm, seems to require at least kernel 4.4 (edit: appears to be supported kernel 3.8 onwards?), but some older Android kernels might be patched for it already. See also: <a href="https://forum.armbian.com/topic/4167-f2fs-revisited/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://forum.armbian.com/topic/4167-f2fs-revisited/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/topic/5177/support-for-f2fs-file-system</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 11:26:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forums.ubports.com/topic/5177.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2020 13:21:08 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Support for F2FS file system? on Sun, 15 Nov 2020 23:35:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The (better) Android vendors seem to think it is worthwhile... and Google is using it in their flagship phones I think.<br />
But yeah just a suggestion, might end up to be not worth the effort.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/42731</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/42731</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[poVoq]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2020 23:35:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Support for F2FS file system? on Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:05:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">in theory if the kernel has f2fs support built in, and all the utilities to use f2fs are present in the build, then it should be possible, however I dont think anyone has ever actually tried, I had asked about this in telegram a couple months ago and this was the answer I was given, I have been debating if I want to try it or not since then.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/42709</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/42709</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tigerpro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:05:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Support for F2FS file system? on Sun, 15 Nov 2020 13:50:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/povoq" aria-label="Profile: poVoq">@<bdi>poVoq</bdi></a> i don't know about the feasability of this, but apps sure are slow to start</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.ubports.com/post/42699</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forums.ubports.com/post/42699</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Emphrath]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2020 13:50:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>