[Beta] Pixel 2 installer config
-
Some small progress I have a Pixel 2 now in my hands and can reproduce the bootloop
Probably going to attach a UART serial cable via USB to see whats going on -
@agates Yes indeed adding clock ignore helped. Though now the problem is, will that keep some hardware out of sleep state, and impact battery life?
-
@flohack Awesome! I guess it will be hard to judge battery life since I haven't used the thing as a daily driver for over a year. I'm eager to try it, though, at least to have a phone to develop apps against.
-
@agates you can try to run this installer config manually with ubports-installer -f walleye.yml - https://github.com/ubports/installer-configs/pull/150
-
@flohack It's working! Typing from ubports on my pixel 2 now!
Thank you!
-
@agates said in [Beta] Pixel 2 installer config:
@flohack It's working! Typing from
ubportson my pixel 2 now!Thank you!
Ubuntu Touch / uTouch
-
@keneda said in [Beta] Pixel 2 installer config:
@agates said in [Beta] Pixel 2 installer config:
@flohack It's working! Typing from
ubportson my pixel 2 now!Thank you!
Ubuntu Touch / uTouch
Ahhh yes, the behavior that drove me away from the community all those years ago: people arguing about the names of things instead of making the experience better for developers
-
@agates
Wow, how can someone feel so bad just because we tell him the right naming of things... ?
Ubports devs themselves remind sometime people here, that ubports is the association that maintain the OS, and not the OS itself , wich is uTouch.
Anyway, sorry hurting your feelings teaching something with kindness. -
@agates Well to be honest, we are we very peacefully about slight variations of things, but with the name of the OS vs the name of the Foundation we need to be strict:
- UBports Foundation is the organization doing development for, but not limited to...
- Ubuntu Touch, which is the official name for the thing we are doing
Why is this important? Ubuntu Touch is containing the word Ubuntu, and its use is being licensed by Canonical Inc. to us so that we can carry on. We do not want to mix it with UBports, and btw @Keneda also uTouch is wrong and please do not use it :). Since if we get sloppy with that, Canonical might think we do not need the license anymore, and revoke it maybe.
Also we are entitled to sub-license the use of "Ubuntu Touch" to vendors and third parties that want to pre-install Ubuntu Touch on their devices. That is a specific right we can give or deny!So, to stay clear of and issues with that, please stick to the naming. Also UBports should not be used as a name for 3rd party Github repos, and other project names, since it marks projects as "officially run by the foundation" in perception of the end user. And there we are strict, you cannot use our name for things that you are doing. You can use "Ubuntu Touch" however...
BR Florian
-
@flohack
I know uTouch is far from being endorsed by Canonical (so you, as ubports, can't endorse it neither), but it's the "little name" lot of users use so i name it because he can see it here and there
-
@keneda said in [Beta] Pixel 2 installer config:
it's the "little name" lot of user use
To be honest, I've only ever seen you using it. And since you've been asked to not do that anymore, I assume we won't be seeing that again.
-
@moem
Well if you search forum you'll see i'm not the only one doing that, even if sure i'm quite active here so lot of recent entries are from me.
It's been quite from the beginning of Ubuntu Touch that this "compressed" name was used (maybe because of some things like that, who knows...).Now like you say, if using it make people here inconfortable i'll no longer use it with no problem.
-
@Flohack thanks for the explanation.
I just thought this comment was unnecessary and out of context. I'm an outsider, don't particularly care (no offense, I detest arguments about labels), and if the project has naming issues perhaps it should be addressed with branding and not forum posts.
Regardless! This is a pixel 2 thread. You were right about the battery. It didn't even last 12 hours for me with just wifi on with nextcloud/caldav and dekko/imap sync.
The good thing is bluetooth etc works fine for audio so far and I was able to pull up a video to watch via jellyfin/jellyfUn. I had no visible issues on install as a user who doesn't know specifics to look for.
It's otherwise sluggish but bearable for a first build. Some of the battery is likely due to age and wear as well, I was pretty rough on this thing. Never been a fan of its USB-C port anyway, always had trouble with charging cables.
-
Pixel 2 is back in the installer, AFAIK it works well enough to be tested with it
-
@flohack Just installed it. So far looking good. Install went flawlessly. No hiccups. Network connected straight away. I will run through my usual app install and see how that goes.
-
Have tested it with a SIM (O2 based). Full SMS and calls working. Clear sound, no loss of screen or screen lock. Texts all sending and receiving correctly. WiFi stable and no drop outs. Volume is good for me (it may vary for others) on the call. Battery life is not good, have charged it to 100% twice today, but it is an old phone and if you replace the battery on a Pixel phone, expect to replace the screen too (very delicate). Indicator LED for charging, messages etc is working.
Booted straight up from cold with no issues being stuck at bootloader. -
@mrt10001 How is the touchscreen responsiveness on yours? I'm getting ghost touches and the like.
-
@bifpowers Should not be an issue and is also out of scope of Ubuntu Touch. We do not mess with the touch screen but just get it as input device from the kernel driver. You might want to check with an Android ROM to see if you have a physical problem
-
@flohack The touchscreen worked on the last Android ROM, so I will flash an Android 9 ROM and see where things are at. Hopefully a reinstall will fix it. Thank you for the help.
-
@bifpowers Hi, sorry for the late reply, work has taken over at the moment. The touchscreen is really good, no issues.
