The MMS lost story

lduboeuf

So i did the "quick" (not so quick) work around.
To have notification of an issue with MMS while receiving, you need to install:

sudo ubports-qa install PR_nuntium_3
sudo ubports-qa install PR_telephony-service_13 (if you want to have the notification )
sudo ubports-qa install PR_messaging-app_248 (if you want to have it displayed in the messaging-app)

A quick test:
Turn off cellular-data, send a MMS to your device, you should be notified something went wrong.

Giiba

@lduboeuf

I have to agree something is better than nothing... I'm hoping the efforts to update ofono bear fruit for this long standing issue.

Does anyone know why fixing this rather basic feature has been so long without resolution?

As for the error text, I feel the wording should properly place blame on the OS as opposed to making it sound as if the sender is at fault

Something like:

Oops, there has been an error with the MMS system and this message could not be retrieved.
Please ensure Cellular Data is ON and MMS settings are correct, then ask the sender to try again.

flohack

@Giiba well bad news first, the version of ofono that Canonical decided to use and that we continued using is now rather a fork than a downstream. So current ofono version were heavily refactored, but our patches do not apply anymore. Theree had to be a lot of fiddling to make ofono even possible for Android back then.

So we are bascially stuck with that ofono, and thats it.

But, for MMS thats not a problem of ofono at all. MMS is such a weird feature that we need 2 or 3 backend services to handle them. So the "rather basic feature" is in fact a very complex interaction with a lot of state-keeping between retries, eventual reboots etc. You need to track incoming informational SMS correctly, track the download of the actual MMS and store the media somewhere. Its rather like a small web service client that needs to be brought up, with a database that persists all the inner state variables.

I personally hope MMS will die one day, its subpar to every messenger you can have, even email is better. Why? Because its so fragile and not even all carriers support it properly. Then you need the frickin´ APN settings for MMS which can be different to internet. The standardization is a joke. You can´t send an MMS to me for example since my contract does not include them. Its a very very ancient thing compared to Telegram Signal etc.

Giiba

@Flohack
Thanks for the insight, it makes more sense now and would seem to justify @lduboeuf 's solution. A person should at least know something was missed.

lduboeuf

@Flohack said in The MMS lost story:

Its a very very ancient thing compared to Telegram Signal etc.

Yeah another aborted standardisation. Will RCS take off one day ?
Here in France MMS is still wildly used, especially for "basic" phone users.

lduboeuf

@Giiba Thanks for the proposition

Giiba

@lduboeuf
MMS is extremely common in Canada too. I've switch a device back to Android for the next few weeks because I need to reliably recieve some MMS's.

By basic I mean expected minimum feature set for a simple user. In Canada it would be GSM/LTE, SMS, MMS, and a camera. No one in my sphere is interested in UT simply because they use MMS too much.

I certainly don't intend to imply anything is 'simple' to implement. Reminds me of the Captive Portal issue, where I've gotten good at figuring out the right address but sure have no idea how other systems guess at this... but they do get it right all the time.

lduboeuf

UI follow up: https://forums.ubports.com/topic/5102/ui-for-mms-errors

flohack

@Giiba BTW captive portal solution is much simpler and still no ine stepped up to do it

Fla

Just a notification to say that MMS is the main pain for me when using UT as it has a deep impact, people expecting me to know / do something when I don't have the info.
I'm willing to pay 100euros to anyone allowing me to know that I received a MMS when I don't have internet turned on and with a link to actually download it.

AppLee

@lduboeuf said in The MMS lost story:

https://github.com/ubports/nuntium/pull/3, https://github.com/ubports/telephony-service/pull/13, https://github.com/ubports/messaging-app/pull/248

I read your modification and read a bit of code around by curiosity.
I noticed this possible error line 490:
attachmentCount = imageCount + videoCount + contactCount;
It should be:
attachmentCount = imageCount + audioCount + videoCount + contactCount;

I didn't get deep in the code, but I if I'm correct, a message with only audio will trigger the error message.

jezek

@Fla said in The MMS lost story:

...allowing me to now that I received a MMS when I don't have internet turned on and with a link to actually download it.

In my country, this service is covered by operator. I seldom turn on mobile data. Without it I can't receive MMS, as you stated, too. But after a day an SMS from my operator comes, with text that I missed an MMS and it provides me an link (with password) where I can download it.

Edit: typo

lduboeuf

@jezek I saw that you like the go lang on your profile, do you know nuntium ( the mms agent) is written in go ?

jezek

@lduboeuf said in The MMS lost story:

@jezek I saw that you like the go lang on your profile, do you know nuntium ( the mms agent) is written in go ?

No, I didn't know. I have no firm comprehension how the message stack works. But, maybe I can help, if you point me in the right direction. What problem do you want to solve?

lduboeuf

@jezek said in The MMS lost story:

No, I didn't know. I have no firm comprehension how the message stack works. But, maybe I can help, if you point me in the right direction. What problem do you want to solve?

Well the final goal for MMS retrieving issue is to provide a deferred download mechanism.
Currently nuntium even if Cellular-data is off try to fetch the mms and fail silently if any issue.
We would need to store the incoming WAP push notification, and propagate the issue to upper layer so that it can be tried later by user action.

jezek

@lduboeuf said in The MMS lost story:

Well the final goal for MMS retrieving issue is to provide a deferred download mechanism.
Currently nuntium even if Cellular-data is off try to fetch the mms and fail silently if any issue.
We would need to store the incoming WAP push notification, and propagate the issue to upper layer so that it can be tried later by user action.

To be sure, we are on the same page, you are reffering to https://github.com/ubports/nuntium repository, right? Have you any exact issue in mind?

A few questions for previous maintainers or just people of knowledge, so I don't have to search and can jump on the train faster.

How to compile and test nuntium. Is there any special way? What is the best pratice? Compiling on computer, then transfer files? I have only one phone and with UT as main driver and I don't want to break it for long time.
Is there any documentation/specification for MMS available?

lduboeuf

@jezek said in The MMS lost story:

To be sure, we are on the same page, you are reffering to https://github.com/ubports/nuntium repository, right?

Yes

Have you any exact issue in mind?

See issues on this repo, the more important one is the deferred download (https://github.com/ubports/nuntium/issues/1)

A few questions for previous maintainers or just people of knowledge, so I don't have to search and can jump on the train faster.

How to compile and test nuntium. Is there any special way? What is the best pratice? Compiling on computer, then transfer files? I have only one phone and with UT as main driver and I don't want to break it for long time.

Normally it compiles with crossbuilder, but i was not lucky last time , or by making a PR, the CI will build nuntium for you and then you can add it with the ubports-qa script.

Is there any documentation/specification for MMS available?

See architecture in the Readme and/or: http://docs.ubports.com/en/latest/systemdev/mms-infrastructure.html ( note that this doc is more a specification than the actual way it works; especially talking about the Incoming MMS workflow )

jezek

@lduboeuf thanks. I've cloned the repo locally and managed to get testcoverage script working.

$ ./scripts/testcoverage.sh                           
?   	_/home/jezek/Projects/nuntium/storage	[no test files]
# _/home/jezek/Projects/nuntium/ofono
ofono/manager.go:100: Print call has possible formatting directive %s
ofono/push.go:105: Errorf call needs 2 args but has 3 args
ofono/pushagent.go:86: Print call has possible formatting directive %s
FAIL	_/home/jezek/Projects/nuntium/ofono [build failed]
FAIL
?   	_/home/jezek/Projects/nuntium/telepathy	[no test files]
?   	_/home/jezek/Projects/nuntium/test	[no test files]
?   	_/home/jezek/Projects/nuntium/cmd/nuntium-inject-push	[no test files]
?   	_/home/jezek/Projects/nuntium/cmd/nuntium-decode-cli	[no test files]
?   	_/home/jezek/Projects/nuntium/cmd/nuntium	[no test files]
ok  	_/home/jezek/Projects/nuntium/mms	0.010s	coverage: 45.3% of statements

It is also possible to build cmd/nuntium using standart go build procedure.

I will investigate the ubports-qa script, to see what it is doing, cause I don't want to push, then wait for github to compile and install via script after every change. I also see couple of test tools in the project dir and a lot of reading stuff.

@Flohack I see, you contributed to nuntium project. Do you have any insights, how to test changes, or do you know anybody who can give me a quick tutorial?

lduboeuf

@jezek said in The MMS lost story:

I will investigate the ubports-qa script, to see what it is doing, cause I don't want to push, then wait for github to compile and install via script after every change. I also see couple of test tools in the project dir and a lot of reading stuff.

The ubports-qa will not help you build it locally. You have to look at crossbuilder https://github.com/ubports/crossbuilder, it used to work, but i had no success last time ( some dependencies need to be added of course with crossbuilder inst-foreign ... )

lduboeuf

Another question, should Ubports still maintain nuntium instead of moving to a more mainstream mms service ( if any ) ?