UBports Robot Logo UBports Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    UT Dream hardware

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off topic
    24 Posts 6 Posters 3.8k Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
      • S Offline
        stan
        last edited by stan

        Please let me ask this as a way of learning ,
        If I'm going to imagine the best hardware that is the Dream of each UT developer to give is the ultimate experience what would it be :

        Body:
        Screen:
        Chipset:
        Memory:
        Storage:
        Battery:
        Connectivity:
        WiFi:
        GPS:
        Bluetooth:
        Rear Camera:
        Front Camera:
        Fingerprint:
        speakers:
        NFC:
        3.5 audio jack:
        UFS 2.0, 3.0, 3.1 :

        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          makeixo
          last edited by

          I dont know enough about hardware to answer that questition.

          I have a Xpiera X with SFOS which runs really smooth, therefore I would say if UT reaches the same "level" on the Xperia X devices I would be statisfied. The only thing I wish for would be a device that acutally takes nice pictures.

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S Offline
            stan @makeixo
            last edited by

            @makeixo thank you very much for your answer

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • ? Offline
              A Former User @stan
              last edited by

              @stan
              I'm not a developer, but I guess they would want a device as open as possible, and with good support/documentation. I get the impression that the team at the centre of UT development really value that from Pine.

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S Offline
                stan @Guest
                last edited by

                @3arn0wl would you mind please help me understand more what does it mean open as possible ? like what hardware when used makes it open

                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ? Offline
                  A Former User @stan
                  last edited by

                  @stan
                  Dalton explains things far better than I could in this recent podcast:
                  https://destinationlinux.org/episode-161/
                  (well worth a listen to).
                  Basically: not all of Android is Open, and Devs spend quite a lot of time working in the dark. With a "Linux phone" like the pinephone, things are apparently much easier.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S Offline
                    stan @Guest
                    last edited by

                    @3arn0wl i was hopping for a combination of hardware specs that when but together it equal a great phone that is easy to use for UT
                    processor x
                    ram 8
                    ufs
                    camera front and 2 back

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S Offline
                      stan
                      last edited by

                      the reason i'm asking is pine phone apparently is the best option
                      but when i see the specs compared to other devices
                      using old memory technology
                      i keep asking my self how it would look on a state of art device

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ? Offline
                        A Former User @stan
                        last edited by

                        @stan
                        Well! The dream UT device for me would be something capable (ram), that could handle convergence well (Not only in terms of being transformative from phone to desktop, but also capable of running X11 apps theron.

                        It would be nice if it also had a decent amount of storage space too - plus an SD card slot.

                        And good battery life.

                        AppLeeA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • AppLeeA Offline
                          AppLee @Guest
                          last edited by

                          @3arn0wl
                          So :
                          octo core 3GHz
                          SD card reader
                          16GB of RAM
                          128GB of eMMC
                          Battery that last a week
                          6" amoled screen @ 4K
                          Front camera 8Mpx
                          Back camera : dual 20Mpx
                          Fingerprint reader
                          Dual USB-C OTG
                          Mini jack audio port
                          Light sensor, accelerometer, magnetometer, GPS/Glonass/Galileo, Wifi all bands, up to 5G, Physical keyboard

                          That would be great, but the PinePhone is enough as is.
                          I guess some insta-lovers would love a 20Mpx front camera and who has enough RAM ???

                          But I agree it would be nice to have some competition to the PinePhone so we can choose the specs like we build a desktop computer, balancing price and higher specs...
                          For me a better camera sensor and slightly more space would be great, but the PinePhone is enough as is

                          ? S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • C Offline
                            Capsia
                            last edited by

                            Agree with AppLee, one thing I really miss on the Pinephone is wireless charging. I liked it very much on the Nexus 5.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ? Offline
                              A Former User @AppLee
                              last edited by

                              @AppLee
                              It used to be said that the iMX chips were the most open/well-documented... Do they have anything this capable? Or is there a better alternative?

                              AppLeeA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • AppLeeA Offline
                                AppLee @Guest
                                last edited by AppLee

                                @3arn0wl iMX make some good products but there are a lot of problems too.
                                I'm working with iMX right now and we have many issues with PCIe server as well as real time issues...
                                But sure you can find many hardware to fit our geek needs, but to create a phone is more than just specs and software.
                                The work done by Pine64 is great and integrating all those parts is not an easy task cf. the problems encountered by Librem.

                                While picking a component off the shelf seems a good way to go it can be problematic while integrating the hardware and sometimes a total waste when trying to port the software.

                                [Edit] About NXP iMX6 we also had trouble with the different RAMs used and eMMCs, the components are seen as 100% compatible but really are not there are slight differences which made on batch OK while a newer purchase didn't work with our product...
                                I'm not an expert, but it appears that I'm working with NXP's product for few months now and I see the limitations πŸ˜‰
                                I also see the pros of using an integrated board so I appreciate even more the work done for the Librem5 and the PinePhone.

                                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ? Offline
                                  A Former User @AppLee
                                  last edited by

                                  πŸ™‚ Thanks for that, @AppLee

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • S Offline
                                    stan @AppLee
                                    last edited by

                                    @AppLee hello
                                    i'm asking to learn ,
                                    isn't the eMMC much slower than UFS ? and using faster storage result in better performance ?

                                    AppLeeA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • AppLeeA Offline
                                      AppLee @stan
                                      last edited by

                                      Hi @stan
                                      You're probably right, but in my project the OS is fully loaded in RAM so no performance issue.

                                      I don't know about UT but I guess it's something similar you load the system in RAM and try to limit disk access.
                                      UFS was designed for cameras so it need to write a 40Mpx picture fast enough and it should also be able to write video stream...

                                      Another aspect is the price tag. Which I don't know about...

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • arubislanderA Offline
                                        arubislander
                                        last edited by arubislander

                                        So maybe let's flip the question around. How much would we be willing to pay for a dream UT device?

                                        Taking into consideration that high-end specs will bring with them high-end prices, but will not automagically mean that the software running on it will run smoothly, cf all the work needed to get the software optimized for PinePhone and Librem 5.

                                        Also, a higher price point would mean a much bigger investment upfront for the company producing the hardware, if they were to partner with the community to produce the software like Pine64 did. Multiple devkits and prototypes were sent to developers.

                                        If the company decided not to be so generous, then they would be forced to hire devs to work on the software for them, because the price point would be a barrier for many in the community to get involved early on.

                                        πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ό πŸ‡³πŸ‡± πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Έ
                                        Happily running Ubuntu Touch
                                        Google Pixel 3a (20.04 DEV)
                                        JingPad (24.04 preview)
                                        Meizu Pro 5 (16.04 DEV)

                                        ? M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • ? Offline
                                          A Former User @arubislander
                                          last edited by A Former User

                                          @arubislander
                                          Well... What I'm really desperate to do is retire my 2007 laptop before it gives up the ghost entirely!
                                          So yes... A truly converging phone would be my laptop replacement, and yes, I would be prepared to pay good laptop prices for the use of that.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • M Offline
                                            makeixo @arubislander
                                            last edited by makeixo

                                            @arubislander I agree with you on that. My Xx shows how smooth an OS can run on nearly 4yrs old hardware. Therefore, pine64 may be is not that for away from a consumer model with fits the need bigger user group.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • S Offline
                                              stan
                                              last edited by

                                              The Reason i asked my question was to learn more about what makes the hardware more compatible, and what we need from the manufactures.
                                              like a clear specs if handed to manufacturer can build and hand it to us. so we can can easily use UT on it

                                              AppLeeA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                              • First post
                                                Last post