UBports Robot Logo UBports Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    The MMS lost story

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OS
    133 Posts 16 Posters 54.8k Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
      • jezekJ Offline
        jezek @lduboeuf
        last edited by

        @dobey said in The MMS lost story:

        I would say, don't worry about this for now. Our CI automatically includes timestamps and git revision when building, so when people are proposing changes to one of our repos, they do not need to mess with the debian changelog.

        And what about the semantic versioning?

        @lduboeuf said in The MMS lost story:

        I would start making the PR ready for review before the versioning question, The maintainer should know what to do there when it will be merged.

        Yop, will do, after the accompanying PRs are review ready. Or I don't need to wait? I bet the nuntium review will demand some commit squashing and some explaining. I changed/added a lot of code compared to the other PRs.

        jEzEk

        dobeyD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • dobeyD Offline
          dobey @jezek
          last edited by

          @jezek said in The MMS lost story:

          And what about the semantic versioning?

          If there's issues with versioning, in that respect, we'll deal with them when migrating the repos to GitLab for supporting 20.04 and having upstream releases (version tags in the repo, so distros can package from them).

          Yop, will do, after the accompanying PRs are review ready. Or I don't need to wait? I bet the nuntium review will demand some commit squashing and some explaining. I changed/added a lot of code compared to the other PRs.

          If there are other PRs in other repos also needed for this, it would be best to propose them all at the same time, so you can link in the description to the other needed PRs, and in what order they need to merge/build. If you have some messy commit history, it is generally best to clean up commit history before hand, indeed.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • jezekJ Offline
            jezek
            last edited by

            Failed MMS redownload progress report:

            This week folowing PRs got update:

            • telepathy-ofono - pushed changes I forgot to push last week 😕 , clean code from my debug logs.
            • history-service - clean code from my debug logs

            Right now I'm writing some tests for telephony-service code I introduced for error message redownload. It's fun, cause I don't know anything about writing tests using qt/c++ and I'm learning new stuff while struggling.

            jEzEk

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • jezekJ Offline
              jezek
              last edited by

              Failed MMS redownload progress report:

              Ok, I admit defeat in the telephony-service testing battle. I've written some code, to test the redownload function, but I couldn't make the tests run. The crossbuilder don't run test. I've read, that I have to run crossbuilder shell to access the container and run tests, but I failed to do so. In the container, I've tried dh_auto_test command, which hangs. I've tried to run a test executable, but it said, that the executable can't be executed. As last resort I copied the project to my phone and tried to run the tests executables there. But I think, the tests need to be run in some special way, cause I didn't manage to run them, so they will pass. I don't know how long will it take me to figure out the test, so I've decided to create an issue and return to them later.

              With the tests skipping, everything is ready for review. These are the PRs for this project:

              • https://github.com/ubports/nuntium/pull/8
              • https://github.com/ubports/telepathy-ofono/pull/20
              • https://github.com/ubports/history-service/pull/35
              • https://github.com/ubports/messaging-app/pull/260
              • https://github.com/ubports/telephony-service/pull/20

              jEzEk

              mardyM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • mardyM Offline
                mardy @jezek
                last edited by mardy

                Hi Jezek,

                Ok, I admit defeat in the telephony-service testing battle. I've written some code, to test the redownload function, but I couldn't make the tests run. The crossbuilder don't run test.

                as a matter of fact, crossbuilder always runs the tests when not cross-building. In other words, if the target architecture is the same as the host architecture, tests will be run. I tried now with telephony-service in my PC and tests are run (and pass), in the xenial branch.

                Just run

                crossbuilder --architecture=amd64
                

                on your branch and you should see the tests being executed.

                jezekJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • jezekJ Offline
                  jezek @mardy
                  last edited by

                  @mardy Thank you, will try. One defeat doesn't mean, I (we) can't win at the end.

                  jEzEk

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • lduboeufL Offline
                    lduboeuf
                    last edited by lduboeuf

                    Hi, as @UniSuperBox said on last Q&A , the feature is ready for testing:

                    You need to be on devel or RC ( since 2021/06/09 )
                    From a terminal, run that commands one by one:

                    sudo ubports-qa install PR_nuntium_8
                    sudo ubports-qa install telepathy-ofono 20
                    sudo ubports-qa install history-service 35
                    sudo ubports-qa install telephony-service 20
                    sudo ubports-qa install messaging-app 260

                    And reboot

                    Test Plan example:
                    Make sure it works as before, send/receive MMS, multiple ones
                    Disable cellular-data, receive a MMS and check if MMS notification is here with the download button
                    Change proxy settings in APN or put wrong settings and check for notification reception

                    D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D Offline
                      domubpkm @lduboeuf
                      last edited by

                      @lduboeuf Technically, there is nothing to prevent from doing it on the most recent RC if you don't want to switch (again) to dev ?

                      lduboeufL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • lduboeufL Offline
                        lduboeuf @domubpkm
                        last edited by

                        @domubpkm it should be good on RC too. Last builds are from one week or two.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • lduboeufL Offline
                          lduboeuf
                          last edited by

                          @jezek

                          Did some test this morning, i have a use case where the message is staying in the "pending state" ( so we can't click redownload button anymore ) even after reboot. It is with bad signal and by putting wrong info in MMS settings
                          In history db the message is x-ubports-nuntium-mms-error-activate-context but the status is still in Pending state

                          nunitum logs:
                          2021/06/11 09:15:26 Trying to set Active property to true for context on true /ril_0/context2
                          2021/06/11 09:15:26 Cannot set Activate to true (try 1/3) interface on /ril_0/context2: org.ofono.Error.NotAttached: GPRS is not attached
                          2021/06/11 09:15:32 Failed to activate for /ril_0/context2 : failed to activate context
                          2021/06/11 09:15:32 Cannot activate ofono context: no context available to activate

                          jezekJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jezekJ Offline
                            jezek @lduboeuf
                            last edited by

                            @lduboeuf It seems you found a bug. You should fill an issue. I have some idea, where the problem is and I will elaborate under the issue. This is a veeery long thread and I don't want to make it any longer. We should close it.

                            Is the bug a big bug? Can we deploy to stable with this bug, or we need to fix it before deploying? Because there is a bigger issue here. I don't have time now to do any work on ubuntu touch due to personal and technical issues. And it will not change (at least) this month.

                            jEzEk

                            lduboeufL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • lduboeufL Offline
                              lduboeuf @jezek
                              last edited by lduboeuf

                              @jezek I don't think that issue is a blocker as it may come in rare situations and moreover will end with the same situation than it is today ( just ask user to send it again). I wll look if i can work around that on messaging app.

                              Yes agree for this thread becoming too long. I would add it in a nuntium PR instead of an issue since it is not merge yet.

                              Hope you will recover soon :). Btw i bet this will not land on OTA-18. Not enough feedback from users and big code base 🙂

                              [Edit]: not possible to work around it on messaging-app

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • R Offline
                                rocket2nfinity
                                last edited by

                                Not sure if this is still needed, but latest ubports email said to test.

                                Fixes MMS perfectly on Nexus 6P

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • R Offline
                                  Rondarius
                                  last edited by Rondarius

                                  It does not solve the mms problem for me. I still get the oops message with Download. I have tried all the suggestions too and nothing works. I am on N6P Devel.

                                  4 Google Pixel 3A
                                  1 Google Nexus 6P
                                  2 Google Nexus 5
                                  2 Pinephones
                                  2 Sony Xperia X

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • R Offline
                                    Rondarius
                                    last edited by

                                    I tried another operator and MMS works, both send and receive MMS. I will contact my operator to see if there is a solution to this.

                                    4 Google Pixel 3A
                                    1 Google Nexus 6P
                                    2 Google Nexus 5
                                    2 Pinephones
                                    2 Sony Xperia X

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • LakotaubpL Offline
                                      Lakotaubp
                                      last edited by

                                      As @jezek and @lduboeuf suggested this thread is very long and far to hard to follow. So I will lock it. A fix has been posted so please as asked try it and report issues in the normal way and let's see how it goes.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • LakotaubpL Lakotaubp locked this topic on
                                      • First post
                                        Last post