https://github.com/ubports/morph-browser/pull/273
Many thanks to ldubeuf @lduboeuf (with the review of UniversalSuperBox @UniSuperBox ) for spending a lot of time to solve this very disabling problem that no longer appears on the Dev channel (i don't know for RC). This is an important step for the good use of Morph-browser on a daily basis. 
Just for information, on the Openstore, a new Webapp creator : Webber.
The application is only in its first steps but seems to me very fluid and easy to use.
Thanks to Tim Süberkrüb.
@ChromiumOS-Guy Thank you to you and @Fuseteam . It is good to realize in a concrete way all the investment time that this requires voluntarily to obtain an app which will make great service to all. It takes a lot of skills of course, but also above all a lot of passion for that.
And this comment is of course valid for all developers who spend number hours to develop apps for UT.
Even if I have two days late (sorry, I didn't know the American thanksgiving day 
), I think that BALCY with his huge work on morph-browser also specifically deserves a big thank you because without his work, the phones would only have rather limited functions... !!
There has been a lot of progress on Morph-browser, thanks, but there are still too many sticking points on it for a browser easy daily use. What do you think of this situation ?
As an indispensable (game ) new port on the OpenStore, there is now Tux Racer. Very happy about that ! 
@PINE64 All this is very attractive. Strongly the final product ! Be carreful to the stock shortage !!
When I learned that Canonical was dropping the project for their own reasons, I was "disappointed". When I heard that Ubports was taking over the project, I had great hope, and it was only confirmed : only developments and prospects !!
What are the progress of the various projects: OTA-23, Ubuntu 20.04 port... ?
It would be fine to have a new communication, some fresh news (on the forum or a new Q&A ?) : the last communication is the Q&A of March 19 i think.
Thanks
@danfro I stop raising issues. I plead guilty!
@danfro changed screenshot..
@danfro small problem noticed of incomplete information (cut) HH:m..
@danfro Great. The sorting is done on the names of the files and not on those of any subfolders.
@danfro That's ok . How are subdirectories and their files considered in sorting ?
@danfro Yes, I saw that the sorting settings were not preserved and I told myself too hat that starting alphabetic/ascending was normal.
@danfro Thanks. Unless I misinterpret it, it seems that the sorting by date is reversed: ascending is in fact descending and vice versa.
@danfro I was not enough accurate : indeed i spoke of the number only : a little more in bold (maybe).
@danfro It already exists! A simple light bolding will suffice! 
@danfro b) This suggests that having a file count indicator might be good too