@arubislander You do have a point. I know our customers more than like can't or wouldn't do it but competitors on the other hand might. Thanks I have a lot to consider as I work through this

@arubislander Thanks for the tip. I am probably gonna go with the SSH option because I have tried the logviewer and I didn't really care for it.

@arubislander said in Paid for Apps??:

So unless the limited version can be run under full confinement, or you are OK with the source being open, you might need to rethink your strategy there.

I am okay with the source being open but I am not sure my partners are. I would prefer to have it open source but I have to sell my partners on it.

So I have been playing with my Pinephone Pro and I have noticed that some apps just don't completely work as intended to. I would like to learn to trouble shoot these issues so I can provide fixes back to the app builder. Where should I start?

@kugiigi That is not a bad idea. Maybe even have a limited version that can be used for free. Hmm now that's an idea.

@arubislander I don't I haven't created a .click yet. I am in the process of making one though. It depends on how it installs. For the .deb file the client will just go to our website and buy the .deb then just run the program.

Also If I can make UT work for my product I can justify a corporate sponsorship of UT to my partners.

Please read my post fully before blowing up at the title.

So I run a company that has built a device that is used specifically for none technical users to be able to scan networks and look for specif traffic exact details are not important. Just know none of this is subscription based, you own what you buy.

So while developing this idea we were looking at many Pine64 products. We decided on the Pinebook Pro for a few reasons.

1. The device is meant to travel and the Pinebook Pro is a solid laptop.
2. The software applications can easily be installed on Armbian with a .deb file
3. As I develop new apps I can sell just the .deb to my pre existing clients.

I am new to UT and I run it on a Pinephone Pro. I really like UT the interface it's great and honestly I think is would be better for my project to be used as the baseline OS (Not super happy with Armbian). Here are some problems I run into though with UT.

1. I don't think there is a way to sell new applications to customers.
2. Can't find a tablet that supports UT and has a modem

I think my project could really promote UT to knew levels we are not offically launching the product until Nov2023 so I have time to make changes. I am going to be diving in to UT more to see if I can make things work on there but right now it's a no go. I would love to here feedback.

@Lakotaubp Thanks I have a tg but I am not on it that much is there a matrix group? If not I might make one.

So I am diving head first in to UT and I running it on a Pinephone pro. I have noticed that the charging indicator doesn't work quite right. Does someone know why or can someone point me in the direction to trouble shoot this myself? I would like to contribute to UT