UBports Robot Logo UBports Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    “installing” UBports into a GNU/Linux “converted” from Android

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
    11 Posts 4 Posters 2.0k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
      • L Offline
        Leppa
        last edited by

        I once had an idea of emulating a newer version of android, or in this case, UBports, on android, and using root to kill all but the most necessary android processes. Or have it use root to simply forward the hardware to the emulation. Then, we'd have Ubuntu Touch as an android app.

        Everyone believes that their actions are better than the alternatives.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • nitrofuranoN Offline
          nitrofurano
          last edited by

          i was referring mostly about doing dualboot, or replacing Android with UBports, not exactly emulation... - but i guess that all possible approaches are welcome

          L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • L Offline
            Leppa @nitrofurano
            last edited by

            @nitrofurano said in “installing” UBports into a GNU/Linux “converted” from Android:

            i was referring mostly about doing dualboot, or replacing Android with UBports, not exactly emulation... - but i guess that all possible approaches are welcome

            So you mean replacing the higher level components of android with that of Ubuntu? That could work.

            Everyone believes that their actions are better than the alternatives.

            nitrofuranoN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • nitrofuranoN Offline
              nitrofurano @Leppa
              last edited by

              @Leppa yes, like that - and having as goal having all (or almost) Android-based hardware running UBports would be really amazing, and perhaps even more motivational for having more UBports users around (so they would not have to forcibly pick a specific hardware for testing it)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • H Offline
                hans1977se
                last edited by

                I would not mind an alternative version of Ubuntu running on top of Android, but I would be sad if it would replace as the only version because I think Ubuntu phones should be as open as possible and be as little as possible dependent on Google and other commercial interests.

                I do not at all mind commercial initiatives using the Ubuntu infrastructure, but I think it is very important that the system itself is as free and open as possible.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • nitrofuranoN Offline
                  nitrofurano
                  last edited by

                  @hans1977se i can see perfectly your point, and that was the reason i started this thread as well

                  as i’m a Debian user as well, i see how relevant is having everything as libre as possible - and from the other side, i see how important is to have all manufactured hardware documented, like in a wiki page (all manufactured hardware i’m also meaning all hardware supported from Android), with each one indexed with their components used, the UBports compatibility issues, etc.

                  as well, would be great if we could have some guidance of tools, tutorials and documentations for helping on this process - would be really great seeing that the UBports supported hardware list can be as large as that supported from Android, i really think that is not impossible at all - this would be really, really great! 🙂

                  H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • H Offline
                    hans1977se @nitrofurano
                    last edited by

                    @nitrofurano , I too think support for a lot of devices would be really great. 🙂 What I worry about is that if the version built on top of Android gets very popular for some reason, the pure Ubuntu version support could get dropped to free up resources to work on the other version.

                    I don't know how serious that scenario would be, but I suspect it would mean an opportunity for Google to track and benefit from us Ubuntu users as well.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      mike @hans1977se
                      last edited by

                      @hans1977se
                      i pray for a.100% linux version from the gui-top to the kernel itself. (crazy workload for centuries 😉 in the moment androidparts are even now in ubuntuphone...[link text](link url)
                      i think it would be a compromise between gnuhurd-free-cheap-software-fans and the wishes of the mainpart of ubport-usere.
                      so a little bit of propritary code drives.allways with the phones. main-reason= the phones hardware is extrem diverse spreading in months... if you are ready with the first 100% gnuhurdlinux- handy....the market is lightyears farther to the stars with new technology-stuff and now one cares about a 100%linuxphone.... to prevent this...i think the only way is a compromise between work-load-power and a little but android here and there

                      All statements without guarantee ---> linux greenhorn-newbie...

                      H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • H Offline
                        hans1977se @mike
                        last edited by

                        @mike , I think a bit of Android here and there is quite different from putting Ubuntu on top of Android as I understand was the idea here. 🙂

                        I don't think the Ubuntu phone has to be completely free and open for every phone in the world, but I do think it is very important that it depends on as little as possible of closed and non-free parts to make it possible to select between at least some open and free phones.

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M Offline
                          mike @hans1977se
                          last edited by

                          @hans1977se
                          shure - you got a point , lets see how we can support and learn this stuff.
                          as more people working on it, its become more and more opensurce. step by step i think. 🙂

                          All statements without guarantee ---> linux greenhorn-newbie...

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post