tedit development and design discussion
-
@danfro that looks very good!
-
@danfro Possible bug on the exit (X) function.
Two scenarios:
Opening tedit ---> do not type any text ---> exit function ok.
Opening tedit ---> type a text then delete it completely ---> tedit offers to save.
Is this wanted?
-
@domubpkm said in tedit development and design discussion:
Opening tedit ---> type a text then delete it completely ---> tedit offers to save.
A TextArea doesn't have an intelligent change detection. So it doesn't "know" if content has been changed. It can't compare content. As a workaround, as soon as any text is entered, it is marked as "changed" by tedit. So yes, this is currently expected behaviour. Although I agree, not perfect.
My only idea would be to constantly keep reading a copy and comparing that. But I don't think that would be good for performance and very reliable. So I am afraid there is not much I can do about it.
-
@danfro said in tedit development and design discussion:
My only idea would be to constantly keep reading a copy and comparing that. But I don't think that would be good for performance and very reliable. So I am afraid there is not much I can do about it
Just an idea : add option 'tedit exit without saving' in saving' window.
-
@domubpkm said in tedit development and design discussion:
Just an idea : add option 'tedit exit without saving' in saving' window.
You are right. I didn't cover this option yet. I assumed the user always wants to save = not loose data. But of course sometimes it is fine to drop changes. Thanks for testing and for the feedback.
-
Particularly in these two cases, the contrast of the options line is a little weak in my opinion.
-
@domubpkm Hmm, true the contrast is not ideal. I will need to investigate if we can set this color. But if there is no easy way, I may need to leave this for another release though. Good catch, I missed that.
-
@danfro Tested last built. That's great for me.
But, since 'save as' output is still active, perhaps a more appropriate title would be 'exit choice'? -
@danfro said in tedit development and design discussion:
My only idea would be to constantly keep reading a copy and comparing that. But I don't think that would be good for performance and very reliable. So I am afraid there is not much I can do about it.
Pardon my intrusion.
Just a suggestion. You don't need to keep the whole text. You can make and store just a hash of the original text (before edited) and compare to a hash of current text (edited) at exit (to see if save is needed).
-
@danfro The copy all function seems to work from the horizontal options line, but not the paste function: I get a white screen after paste.
-
@domubpkm Fixed now. Forgot to delete one line. Thanks.
-
@domubpkm I rephrased the dialog a bit. Should be better now.
-
@jezek I never used hashes to compare anything, but sounds like a good idea. Thanks for the suggestion. Although this may need to wait for a future version too.
-
@danfro Another suggestion (personal opinion) for a future update: the order of the options icons, whether in the vertical main menu or the horizontal menu, could be revised. I read from left to right and top to bottom.
On this principle: I will put this order: for the icons mentioned: select all, copy, paste, empty the area, empty the clipboard.. -
@domubpkm So far I kept the exiting order from the menu to the toolbar.
The order in the menu seems to make sense to me. First file actions (new, open, save, save as), then text area actions (undo, redo, select all, clear all), followed by clipboard actions (paste, copy, clear) and at the end special actions. But of course that is grouped by kind of internal functionality. This may not be obvious to the user.Your suggested order would mix clipboard and text area options, but I can see some pattern from a users point of view. Maybe we can get some more opinions here from other users. The change is easily done...
-
@domubpkm I decided to do the button reordering. I also moved the exit button to the right top corner. That is where most other (desktop) apps have the close X button. And I fixed the colors of the icons on bad contrast as reported above. It would be great if you could please give the last build another test. If things work fine, I would consider this ready to be released.
-
@danfro Great work. Reordering the icons makes sense from the user's point of view. The contrast is perfect. Overall, a great update. THANK YOU !
-
@domubpkm Thank you for all testing and suggestions.
I am not going to work on file filtering or such for this release. But this is on my todo list near the top. I hope it proofs not to be too difficult.
But I think about sneaking one small change into this release to hopefully make finding a file a bit easier. What do you think about having encrypted file names being colored different? I can imagine, this helps to visually filter files when you are looking for an encrypted file only.
I can make them colored orange for instance. I would not use blue, red or green. The mean "activity", "positive" or "negative" in our UI guidelines.
EDIT: There would be a switch in settings to turn the highlight off/on (default is on).
-
@danfro Or another idea (yeah, it never stops ), it might be more consistent to show the padlock icon for encrypted files. This can be of course combined with the (optional, setting) file name color.
-
@danfro Good idea to put the encrypted notes in another color. this will help a little. For the color to respect, why not orange in fact, or a purple which makes a slightly less significant contrast. Your idea of ββgiving encrypted files a different color makes me think that in the future, encrypted and unencrypted files could, if desired, be grouped into two groups.