UBports Robot Logo UBports Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Q&A 62 Saturday 2nd of November at 19:00 UTC

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    23 Posts 16 Posters 4.6k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
      • libremaxL Offline
        libremax @Aury88
        last edited by

        @Aury88 In 2020, I hope for ubuntu 20.04 migration (with new Qt Stack,...) + pinephone port + librem 5 port.

        It would already be a big achievement.

        Donate anonymously 1€/$ by year to UBports, all Ubuntu Touch users can do it ! Demonstration:
        https://forums.ubports.com/topic/1262/donate-anonymously-1-by-year-to-ubports-all-ubuntu-touch-users-can-do-it-demonstration/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • M Offline
          matteo
          last edited by matteo

          Question for Q&A: a topic being discussed very often is regarding the unconfined status of apps: some people think it's good to have unconfined apps published in the OpenStore (in its origins, OpenStore was designed to have mostly experimental and unconfined apps, if I'm not mistaken), others are much more strict, I would say evangelically against it and they think the unconfinement shall only be reserved to the OS itself and to its functionality, some others have an average opinion, i.e. unconfined apps can be published to the OpenStore but those shall be segregated into a different section and well recognizable from the confined ones. I understand what's the purpose of having confined apps on a modern OS like UT and all the risks of not strictly implementing the apparmor rules; but, at the same time, I believe exceptions could be taken into account, given some barriers and conditions to be overcome and satisfied first: for instance, it shall be judged the reputation and reliability of the app developer (in case he/she is a member of the UBports Community for a long time), if the proposed app is considered or not an asset for the Community, if the app has an open source code to be dug and deeply checked in order to find any malicious intention....To summarize, in my humble opinion there shall be clear rules to be followed but I think up to now there was lack of official instructions in this regard. I would like to know what you guys think about this topic. Thank you in advance for any attention you might pay to the present question. Matteo

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • TotalSonicT Offline
            TotalSonic
            last edited by TotalSonic

            Has there been any actual communication from UBports with the Volla people regarding their advertising possible support for a UT port (if "stretch funding" of over $400k is met) to their proposed phone that is now having a KickStarter?
            Info here - https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/volla/volla-phone-freedom-through-simplicity-and-security

            Best regards,
            Steve Berson

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ? Offline
              A Former User @UBportsNews
              last edited by

              i just wared to say "Thank you" for the new UT - I LOVE it - and express my gratitude for your continued hard work.

              D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • D Offline
                domubpkm @Guest
                last edited by

                @3arn0wl What do you call "new" UT ? OTA-11 or new devel ? Anyway, we are on the same page, both are fine ! 😉

                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ? Offline
                  A Former User @domubpkm
                  last edited by

                  Hehe The new new, @domubpkm - the beautiful dev channel. 😄

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E Offline
                    extraymond
                    last edited by

                    Q1: What's the plan onward about libertine?
                    With libhandy and kirigami maturing, we can assume more desktop's app's will be mobile optimized. It seems to be easier finding desktop apps that support mobile then the other way around. It aligns with the convergence goal too.

                    Q2: What kind of specification would new ports need for convergence to work? More broadly speaking, are there specific plan about this?

                    Guys you rock!!!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • poVoqP Offline
                      poVoq
                      last edited by poVoq

                      Q1: Any plans to work more on the mobile screen part of convergence, e.g. the stuff that shows up on the phone screen when also connected to larger screen? Maybe something together with to KDEconnect support?

                      Q2: What is the status of Miracast support on UT? Is it still working?

                      Fairphone 5 (waiting for port)

                      TotalSonicT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • TotalSonicT Offline
                        TotalSonic @poVoq
                        last edited by

                        @poVoq - Miracast is working fine on OnePlus One and Meizu Pro 5 on OTA11 in my tests, when using a Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter. Font rendering is a tiny bit blurry but display is otherwise works fine (including video playback), although there is a bit of lag when using a bluetooth keyboard/trackpad with it

                        Best regards,
                        Steve Berson

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • G Offline
                          GizmoChicken @alan_g
                          last edited by

                          @alan_g said in Q&A 62 Saturday 2nd of November at 19:00 UTC:

                          Could something like a Wiki be used on unity8.io for the current status of desktop, install instructions, etc.? And linked to from the landing page?

                          @UniSuperBox Until very recently, the landing page for https://github.com/ubports/unity8/ (to which the unity8.io page (and elsewhere) still links) included instructions for installing Unity8 on Ubuntu. However, the instructions for installing Unity8 on Ubuntu were removed when the "readme" file was removed. Could you at least add back the "readme" file?

                          G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • PhoenixLandPiratP Offline
                            PhoenixLandPirat
                            last edited by

                            QUESTION: This is aimed at Dalton, are your legs good again yet?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • G Offline
                              GizmoChicken @GizmoChicken
                              last edited by

                              @GizmoChicken said in Q&A 62 Saturday 2nd of November at 19:00 UTC:

                              @alan_g said in Q&A 62 Saturday 2nd of November at 19:00 UTC:

                              Could something like a Wiki be used on unity8.io for the current status of desktop, install instructions, etc.? And linked to from the landing page?

                              @UniSuperBox Until very recently, the landing page for https://github.com/ubports/unity8/ (to which the unity8.io page (and elsewhere) still links) included instructions for installing Unity8 on Ubuntu. However, the instructions for installing Unity8 on Ubuntu were removed when the "readme" file was removed. Could you at least add back the "readme" file?

                              I submitted a pull request to add back the old "readme" file, which includes instructions for installing Unity8 on Ubuntu desktop. See https://github.com/ubports/unity8/pull/221

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M Offline
                                matteo @matteo
                                last edited by

                                @matteo thanks @NeoTheThird, @mariogrip and @UniSuperBox for replying to my question regarding the unconfined apps in OpenStore. Incidentally I'm developing an app which is unconfined not because I wanted to by-pass the apparmor rules, but because I had no choice in order to make it work (see dataMonitor).
                                If there will be the chance to add a confinement layer tailored on apps needs, it would be great. I hope one day my app functionalities will be included in the OS "Settings" section, but in the meantime I could eventually think to publish it on the OpenStore, following the instructions of the UBports team ☺ .

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post