UBports Robot Logo UBports Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Intuitive and correct names for "Linux ports" and "Android ports"

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General
    13 Posts 7 Posters 978 Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
      • CiberSheepC Offline
        CiberSheep @doniks
        last edited by

        @doniks This is interesting.

        I think that making an «Android-centric» name is not good. As I believe, new comers are looking for an Android roms and not Android kernel based.

        Devices that use «mainline kernel» vs «Hallium based» devices is better for me 🙂

        Another planet, another time, another universe!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
        • C Offline
          cliffcoggin @doniks
          last edited by

          @doniks said in Intuitive and correct names for "Linux ports" and "Android ports":
          It would be so unfair to stain these heroic game changers with a name like "Non-Android". As if that was something that they lack and not something that they were liberated from.

          Picking up on the liberation idea, what about "Android-free" instead of "Non-Android"?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • AppLeeA Offline
            AppLee @doniks
            last edited by

            @doniks
            Interesting topic indeed.

            If I understand correctly even Halium is not correct as some ports called Legacy (I guess) are not based on it.
            But if I'm still correct, both are based on Hybris so I would call them :
            "Hybris based" ports or devices and "Mainlined" ports or devices.

            In the "Hybris based" I'd say there are "Halium based" ports and "Legacy" ports.
            IIRC legacy because they are inheritance from Canonical, right ?!

            KenedaK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • KenedaK Offline
              Keneda @AppLee
              last edited by

              @applee said in Intuitive and correct names for "Linux ports" and "Android ports":

              IIRC legacy because they are inheritance from Canonical, right ?!

              Yes, and those are the BQ and Meizu devices.

              2015-2023 : Meizu MX4 ☠️⚰️✝️
              2023-2024 : Nexus 5 ☠️⚰️✝️
              2024-***** : FPOS Fairphone 5 waiting UT for freedom 😉
              🇲🇫🇬🇧

              AppLeeA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • AppLeeA Offline
                AppLee @Keneda
                last edited by

                @keneda Nexus 5 too IIRC

                KenedaK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • KenedaK Offline
                  Keneda @AppLee
                  last edited by

                  @applee Isn't N5 the first port from UBports?

                  2015-2023 : Meizu MX4 ☠️⚰️✝️
                  2023-2024 : Nexus 5 ☠️⚰️✝️
                  2024-***** : FPOS Fairphone 5 waiting UT for freedom 😉
                  🇲🇫🇬🇧

                  arubislanderA dobeyD 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • arubislanderA Offline
                    arubislander @Keneda
                    last edited by

                    I don't think "legacy" is totally equivalent to 'inherited from Canonical'. Rather it denotes non-Halium ports.

                    🇦🇼 🇳🇱 🇺🇸 🇪🇸
                    Happily running Ubuntu Touch
                    Google Pixel 3a (20.04 DEV)
                    JingPad (24.04 preview)
                    Meizu Pro 5 (16.04 DEV)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • arubislanderA Offline
                      arubislander @Keneda
                      last edited by

                      @keneda I am pretty sure there was a port for the Nexus 5 since the Canonical days

                      🇦🇼 🇳🇱 🇺🇸 🇪🇸
                      Happily running Ubuntu Touch
                      Google Pixel 3a (20.04 DEV)
                      JingPad (24.04 preview)
                      Meizu Pro 5 (16.04 DEV)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dobeyD Offline
                        dobey @Keneda
                        last edited by

                        @keneda No. Fairphone 2 or OnePlus 1 I think. N5 existed back then, but I don't think it was under the scope of UBports really. Someone else just did a port.

                        KenedaK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dobeyD Offline
                          dobey @doniks
                          last edited by

                          @doniks said in Intuitive and correct names for "Linux ports" and "Android ports":

                          My first idea would be "Linux based" and "Android based". I personally find it intuitive enough, but of course it is not correct. Android itself is Linux based.

                          Both are still Linux. The proper distinction here is "upstream" versus "Android" version of kernel. Though, technically speaking, the PinePhone, PineTab, and RPi do not use mainline kernel, as it's not built from upstream git, but instead use specific kernel versions and configs, which may also have patches not yet accepted upstream.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • KenedaK Offline
                            Keneda @dobey
                            last edited by

                            @dobey
                            Yes i searched the net and found something on XDA back in 2014 https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/port-ubuntu-touch-for-nexus-5.2594874/

                            2015-2023 : Meizu MX4 ☠️⚰️✝️
                            2023-2024 : Nexus 5 ☠️⚰️✝️
                            2024-***** : FPOS Fairphone 5 waiting UT for freedom 😉
                            🇲🇫🇬🇧

                            dobeyD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • dobeyD Offline
                              dobey @Keneda
                              last edited by

                              @keneda Not sure if that's the same person, but the port I remember using was maintained by tassadar (the MultiROM author).

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post