Sapot browser
-
@kugiigi
'Favoris' (french) means 'bookmarks' and
'Supprimer' (french) means 'Delete'
-
@kugiigi ok, i tested. It's just a way to delete or add a favorite. I wanted to avoid deleting all favorites at once (even though I know how to restore them)
-
The copy paste window inside sites, function with the same bug like Morph
-
@kugiigi New 'monstrous' update today. How much work I imagine. Thank you for all this willingness to bring innovations.
-
@domubpkm is it possible to import bookmarks from HTML?
-
@lsitongia If Morph doesn't then no
How does that work anyway? HTML contains all the bookmarks? Is that a common exporting feature in browsers? -
@kugiigi In firefox there is an option to export/import your bookmarks to/from an HTML-file.
-
@kristatos Is it a standard format though? Like it is compatible with different browsers. Because if it is then maybe it's worth implementing it.
-
@kugiigi I don't know, I don't use any other browser than firefox. I'm doing backups of my booksmarks this way since years.
I've searched a bit and chrome seems to support HTML-booksmarks also. I don't know if there's a standard format for doing this, but here someone explained the format used within firefox. -
Vivaldi and Falkon also import and export HTML bookmarks which are compatible with each other and Firefox.
-
Import/export of HTML bookmarks would be a great improvement to Sapot and Morph. I haven't been able to find a way to convert HTML bookmarks into the tagging mechanism that these browsers use. Other browsers let me import the HTML and preserve the folder layout that I have for the bookmarks. I usually have to drag and drop into whatever the folder is for the bookmark toolbar for a particular browser, but that's about the only part that varies from browser to browser.
-
Saving and restoring bookmarks is not a problem with the corresponding file. What has always bothered me is that I can't delete an empty bookmark folder with morph and probably Sapot (i didn't check).
-
Something else: I tested browser security via https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/. Thanks to uAdblock I have a strong protection against tracking. Problem: with Morph Browser i have a "nearly unique fingerprint", with Sapot "a unique fingerprint". Why is there a difference (nearly unique vs unique)? What can be done to be not that unique? Is there anything that can be done to adress the key problem that UT users are probably just more easily identifyable because there are so few of us? Does anyone of you use VPN with your phone?
BR
-
@taiga-woods The usefulness of a VPN under morph or Sapot is quite relative currently due to the DNS leaks and WebRTC leaks of browsers
-
The same result with vpn and without it. As for uAdblock, it stopped working for me yesterday on focal (dev), and I know, the developer said he will stop managing and developing it at the end of the month https://forums.ubports.com/topic/8514/who-wants-to-maintain-uadblock-backend-app.