How important is strong hardware?
-
Hi @domubpkm exactly what Arubislander said.
The website is developed with chrome because it cost more money to have it compatible with Chrome, Safari AND Firefox.
So they basically decided to use Chrome because it's used by a majority of people.It's Internet Explorer vs Firefox all over again.
But Chrome (and
GoogleAlphabet) is also responsible.
Because like IE they created "features" that are intended towards easing the work of some developers hoping that website will design for their browser.
By doing so they also break compatibility and standards to bring something that most of the time is useless.But that's how you lock users down to your technology.
And notice that nowhere in the story the user comes into play ; we are just pawns used to bring more money to a table that should not exist.Google if they weren't ill intended should have contributed to Firefox instead of trying to steal the market.
But no, think no evil they said... -
@AppLee said in How important is strong hardware?:
And notice that nowhere in the story the user comes into play ;
But yes !! there is still a need for users or consumers to be able to mow them! 'Shrinrkflation' is an example outside of IT
-
@domubpkm Of course but users usually work around things or comply. It's rare that people act and leave them dry
-
I have a few defunct Apple products deemed useless due to outdated software. My Ipad 1 is a great jukebox and I can still go on the internet with it, and no I haven't been hacked!
(I hate Apple's fakery of charging $$$$ for proprietary rubbish that has limited lifespan, is difficult (very difficult) too repair and the green credentials they harp on about - Apple, I hate you).
-
For phone usage (text, limited internet/browser, calls) I found a Pixel 3a to be more than adequate. I don't use WayDroid or other functionality all that much on a phone, the screen is simply too small.
I noticed some performance uptick with a OnePlus 6T but not really a "necessary" upgrade. The main thing moreso is 'does the UBPorts software support the phone or are there missing features because of the port itself'.
My current FairPhone 4 is decidedly snappy during use, but what I thought was most interesting is it works quite well with a docking station, even with dual monitors. I have tried both the Dell WD15 K17A and WD22TB4 docks and found them to be completely compatible. The WD22TB4 is significantly faster.
What I need most is stronger camera performance but Android has certain things on lockdown that prevent some camera potential from being tapped.
-
@ezst036 Unrelated but you mean you can have dual monitor with the Fairphone 4?
-
@kugiigi yeah, the SoC supports two displays at 1080p
-
@kugiigi I just had the conversation with @ezst036. I was asking if he manage to extend screen on dual monitors or if he just repeat the same screen on eahc monitor. I understand it was the second option...
@TheVancedGamer you managed to extend on dual monitor ??? -
@AmauryDBZ lomiri doesn't support extending displays yet sadly
-
@TheVancedGamer ok it confirm what I thought. Thanks !
-
@TheVancedGamer Oh that's cool. I guess you need a dock with multiple video out is needed. Maybe both monitors would work properly if you enable multi-display mode instead of the virtual touchpad mode.
-
Just wanted to clarify,
Yes, it was two monitors but they were mirrored, not extended. Makes the second monitor pointless for now.
