UBports Robot Logo UBports Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    [Question] getprop in a confined app?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved App Development
    14 Posts 4 Posters 203 Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
      • pparentP Online
        pparent
        last edited by

        This is outdated:

        https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+package/libhybris-utils

        pparentP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • pparentP Online
          pparent @pparent
          last edited by pparent

          said in [Question] getprop in a confined app?:

          libhybris-utils

          Ok I've found

          apt download libhybris-utils:arm64
          

          Inside the clickable containre allows to download the deb package, then you can extract from it the getprop binary.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • pparentP pparent marked this topic as a question
          • pparentP pparent has marked this topic as solved
          • pparentP pparent has marked this topic as solved
          • K Offline
            kugiigi
            last edited by

            Can't you get the density somewhere else? For example in QML, you use Screen.

            pparentP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • pparentP Online
              pparent @kugiigi
              last edited by pparent

              @kugiigi

              Well I've tried with density from qt, but it does not seem to give coherent results across devices.

              G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G Online
                gpatel-fr @pparent
                last edited by

                @pparent said in [Question] getprop in a confined app?:

                coherent results !

                well, concerning Fairphone specs, not sure if coherence is an appropriate word. For example, on the Fairphone site and so everywhere on the web, you can read that FP5 screen is 6.46 inches; that is, about 16.4 cm unless they have special dutch inches.
                I have a Fairphone 5 and it is no more than 16 cm in total, including the somewhat 10mm of margins in the height direction, so real meaningful screen height is more about 15cm, that is, what you could imply from the mentioned density on third party sites, so 5.88 inches (2700 / 459 = 5.88). BTW getprop returns 480 dpi on my FP5.
                It's difficult to square up all these numbers and I wonder if the FP4 is any better.

                pparentP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • pparentP Online
                  pparent @gpatel-fr
                  last edited by arubislander

                  @gpatel-fr

                  Here are the datas I have for vollaphone 22 and vollaphone x23

                                            Official PPI    Qt density      getprop density
                      Vollaphone  22        410	            252	            480
                      Vollaphone X23        282	            216	            320
                  

                  Getprop seems always official value rounded up to the closest possible value for android (that seem to be only a handfull of values), but seem quite coherent in proportion, contrary to qt density.

                  G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G Online
                    gpatel-fr @pparent
                    last edited by gpatel-fr

                    @pparent

                    Sorry for the delay, it has taken some time for running a basic QT program on UT without any prior experience.

                    yes you are right about Android rounding values, however it's not possible that QT takes values from Android since for QT it runs on a standard Linux system.

                    about the 'bad' values in QScreen, I have found that the 'name' property is 'XWAYLAND0', so QT is connecting to the X server part of Mir to get at the screen properties. I have found this comment in QT sources (qtbase/src/3rdparty/wayland/protocols/xdg-output/xdg-output-unstable-v1.xml)

                       <event name="logical_size">
                          <description summary="size of the output in the global compositor space">
                            The logical_size event describes the size of the output in the 
                            global compositor space.
                        
                            Most regular Wayland clients should not pay attention to the
                            logical size and would rather rely on xdg_shell interfaces.
                      
                            Some clients such as Xwayland, however, need this to configure
                            their surfaces in the global compositor space as the compositor
                            may apply a different scale from what is advertised by the output
                            scaling property (to achieve fractional scaling, for example).
                    

                    for sure I don't understand the implications well enough to qualify this result as an 'Ubuntu touch bug', but some sort of rescaling in the Lomiri touch code could explain that the physical size of my FP5 is all over the place according to QScreen (21.4cm instead of 16cm)

                    pparentP K 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • pparentP Online
                      pparent @gpatel-fr
                      last edited by pparent

                      @gpatel-fr

                      Well anyway I think the best thing to do would be that every port register the real DPI value of their screen, and then the value is accessible to the app via an environment variable. It would allow non-Qt app to scale correctly as easily as possible.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K Offline
                        kugiigi @gpatel-fr
                        last edited by

                        @gpatel-fr There's a known bug with the FP5's detected screen size. This is why Morph and webapps loads desktop version of sites. If I remember correctly, the porter said that it's an issue with the firmware itself or kinda Fairphone's fault. I think he has a solution but he needs to find a general solution that won't affect other devices.

                        @pparent I'm curious what exactly you are using because on my apps using Screen.pixelDensity works fine except as I mentioned above, the FP5. I don't have Volla phones though so not sure there

                        pparentP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • pparentP Online
                          pparent @kugiigi
                          last edited by pparent

                          @kugiigi

                          Can you give the exact code of a program that will return the dpi?

                          Note that I'm trying to scale a non-Qt application, so I can use a secondary qt utility to get the screen density, but nothing more.

                          What I have tried that does not give good results is:

                          #include <QGuiApplication>
                          #include <QScreen>
                          #include <QDebug>
                          #include <iostream>
                          using namespace std;
                          
                          int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
                              QGuiApplication app(argc, argv);
                          
                              QScreen *screen = QGuiApplication::primaryScreen();
                              qreal dpi =  screen->logicalDotsPerInch();  // Moyenne approximative
                              cout << dpi <<endl;
                          
                              return 0;
                          }
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post