UBports Robot Logo UBports Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Touch 15.04 (rt) 19.10.70 on OPO CM has no Soft-Buttons, intentially ?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Porting
    11 Posts 5 Posters 2.2k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
      • ? Offline
        A Former User
        last edited by

        Flashing the OPO per adb, github and script worked fine, almost everything is nice, i even found and integrated the Place to be for Ringtones etc., but
        I don't have Menu, Home and Back Soft-Button on the Display active, is this meant to be like this, or do i have to do some afterwork for this device ??

        THX for your work and effort to improve this almost "Google-free" System.
        Is there some Statement, what Google will get on Info per Device/User due to the remaining Android Kernel SW for HW Control ??

        advocatuxA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • advocatuxA Offline
          advocatux @Guest
          last edited by advocatux

          @Pet_HH if I'm understanding you correctly, you're talking about the standard buttons in Android phones? Those doesn't exist in Ubuntu phones.

          You get the menu swiping the screen from the left hand side, Home is in the lower part [*] in that menu. On the other hand a "hard code" back button would be really useful.

          [*] Edit: Home button is the Ubuntu logo for now.

          G ? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G Offline
            guru @advocatux
            last edited by

            @advocatux said in Touch 15.04 (rt) 19.10.70 on OPO CM has no Soft-Buttons, intentially ?:

            @Pet_HH if I'm understanding you correctly, you're talking about the standard buttons in Android phones? Those doesn't exist in Ubuntu phones.

            You get the menu swiping the screen from the left hand side, Home is in the lower part [*] in that menu. On the other hand a "hard code" back button would be really useful.

            I'm a BQ E4.5 user for two++ years now and never missed some back button. The swiping of the left hand side menu and swiping of all launched apps is a really nice concept. I always miss this in other phones I tried to use.

            matthias

            ? advocatuxA 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • ? Offline
              A Former User @advocatux
              last edited by

              @advocatux thx for your reply. That is what i guessed. With a Smartphone like OPO and the "back" Button in the top left corner, i have an issue, because i the Phone is quite big, and reach to that < i have to change the position of the Phone in my hand, left or right doesn't really make a difference.
              In that case i would prefer to size the screen down to a Window.

              But thx anyway !

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ? Offline
                A Former User @guru
                last edited by

                @guru Hej matthias, you are right in general, but as i told @advocatux , i find it hard to come to the top left corner with thw phone in my left hand, and i hate to work on the display with two hands.
                The other thing is, the OPO has a resolution and so on, which doesn't make it easy to hit the right place for sweeping.
                That makes it hard sometimes to change apps or just shut them.
                But i think, i will get used to that sometimes.

                Thx for your Reply !

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • advocatuxA Offline
                  advocatux @guru
                  last edited by

                  @guru I've been using my BQ E4.5 for more than two years too.

                  Sometimes a back button a la android would be handy, like for the webbrowser for example. It also depends if you're using the phone with one or two hands.

                  Of course this is just anecdotal, and that's not a deal breaker to me.

                  flohackF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • flohackF Offline
                    flohack @advocatux
                    last edited by

                    @advocatux Apps can react on certain swipe gestures themselves, so if you like plz open a ticket for improvement on the webbrowser-app to include a back gesture πŸ˜ƒ

                    To me the support of hardware buttons would be easy to implement, but the current UI has no room for soft buttons as many phones require, so this would mean a complete change in philosophy. I like the button-less design of this OS!

                    BR

                    My languages: πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

                    advocatuxA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • H Offline
                      hans1977se
                      last edited by

                      I had Android before I changed to UT, and it did not take long time before the new UI felt superior. πŸ™‚

                      I don't miss the back button, but a configuration for those who miss it would be OK provided that it does not cost too much development efforts. πŸ™‚

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • advocatuxA Offline
                        advocatux @flohack
                        last edited by

                        @Flohack I do agree UT UI is better than Android ones as @hans1977se says.

                        However I think a back gesture in the webbrowser app is really an improvement. I'll file a ticket for that.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ? Offline
                          A Former User
                          last edited by A Former User

                          Reading the Answers to my Post i have some suggestions to perhaps improve the Project.
                          I understand the UbPorts "philosophie" to have an own way of handling a Mobile.
                          But, this mustn't mean, to not support Features in a Phone, that are supported by Android, just because they are supported.
                          It could also mean, to have a new Design-Feature like Gestures, without leaving built-in Phone Features unused.
                          It would give any User an additional choice between two possibilities.
                          What really bothers in the Moment is the Charge-Indicator that doesn't function at all.
                          I honour your Work very much, but you would be doing better, to give the Users a Choice, and an additional Feature by getting al the best out of her/his Phone.
                          Everything else would be a "Willing by force" from the Customer Point of view, and that is a No-Go from Marketing Aspects.
                          I would take Part in Developing on my own, but the times i did SW Development ist some 35 Years ago and stuck in Assembler and Fortran 4, 77 on RSX 11M.

                          Today i START Phyton and C++ on Raspberry 2 + 3.

                          THX and a very nice Day.

                          G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • G Offline
                            guru @Guest
                            last edited by

                            @Pet_HH said in Touch 15.04 (rt) 19.10.70 on OPO CM has no Soft-Buttons, intentially ?:

                            I would take Part in Developing on my own, but the times i did SW Development ist some 35 Years ago and stuck in Assembler and Fortran 4, 77 on RSX 11M.

                            Welcome in club. I started 36 years ago with Assembler and Fortran 4 on an IBM /370 clone in the GDR (ESER 1055) and with UNIX v7 on some RSX11 clone too (forgot its name in the Eastblock). I'm still doing sw development, mostly with C on Linux, but in my spare time kernel-testing and hacking on FreeBSD, and since 2++ years for the BQ E4.5 (wrote some click pkg for the MUA mutt).

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post