Intransparent and incomplete maturity ranking?
-
@flohack said in Intransparent and incomplete maturity ranking?:
Forum masters a free to do what they want or not. But sometimes the question arrises in me: To people post to answer a question, or do people post, do make a poster stop posting?
-
@peter-gamma I thougt the device page is community driven - like everything.
Why don't you help to improove it instead of making something new (with a new community??)?See here
I may be wrong. I have not looked into it further
-
@peter-gamma and your last post isn't an answer.
-
I hate spoliers but https://forums.ubports.com/topic/5656/new-devices-page-now-online
-
@lakotaubp lol
-
I think the new page will improve the situation significantly.
-
Yes the new page is very nice.
I emphasis that one should look at "promoted" devices to discover the features coverage.
But I guess many of the other devices will have their matrix sooner or later.Now a bit of constructive criticism, the "battery last more than 24h" is hard to define so many the methodology to measure this might be explained.
For example screen off >23h, what kind of connectivity and data usage.
To explain what people might not get, for example the Nexus5 with weak 4G, wifi on but not connected and screen off will hardly get the 24h. But with 2G or a better network coverage it can. -
-
as mentioned in an other thread, the new device page is a hughe step foreward.
To some extent, the "degree of maturity“ is somewhat dependent on the individual use case. In the blog @UniSuperBox suggested using the survey results to weight maturity ratings. Would it not be better to have an "individual user profile" questionaire and then match the profile to the devices? Answer 10 questions on a visual analog scale (0=couldn't care less, 10=can't live without) and than list all devices matching that individual profile? -
Anything is possible with enough hours of work
In other words, I'm not sure if the impact in new users and potential contributors would be worth the time.
