UBports Robot Logo UBports Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Enabilng webgl

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Support
    5 Posts 5 Posters 583 Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
      • S Offline
        suoko
        last edited by

        I enabled webgl followingthe commands found in telegram:

        These are the Terminal commands I used: 
        sudo ubports-qa install xenial_-_gpu-browser
        
        sudo -i
        
        mount -o remount,rw /
        
        cd /etc/profile.d/
        
        cp disable-qtwebengine-gpu.sh disable-qtwebengine-gpu.old
        
        rm disable-qtwebengine-gpu.sh
        

        and it works ok but i'm left with this apt status:

        ablet@ubuntu-phablet:~$ sudo apt dist-upgrade
        Reading package lists... Done
        Building dependency tree       
        Reading state information... Done
        Calculating upgrade... Done
        The following packages will be DOWNGRADED:
          lxc-android-config
        0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 downgraded, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
        Need to get 0 B/48.7 kB of archives.
        After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
        Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
        dpkg: warning: downgrading lxc-android-config from 0.233+ubports0+0~20210326233237.3~1.gbp614445 to 0.233+ubports0+0~20210319074119.1~1.gbp6f8eda
        (Reading database ... 51142 files and directories currently installed.)
        Preparing to unpack .../lxc-android-config_0.233+ubports0+0~20210319074119.1~1.gbp6f8eda_all.deb ...
        Unpacking lxc-android-config (0.233+ubports0+0~20210319074119.1~1.gbp6f8eda) over (0.233+ubports0+0~20210326233237.3~1.gbp614445) ...
        dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/lxc-android-config_0.233+ubports0+0~20210319074119.1~1.gbp6f8eda_all.deb (--unpack):
         unable to make backup link of './lib/udev/rules.d/70-android.rules' before installing new version: Invalid cross-device link
        Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19.1) ...
        Processing triggers for dbus (1.10.6-1ubuntu3.6) ...
        Errors were encountered while processing:
         /var/cache/apt/archives/lxc-android-config_0.233+ubports0+0~20210319074119.1~1.gbp6f8eda_all.deb
        W: No sandbox user '_apt' on the system, can not drop privileges
        E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
        

        Can this be fixed?

        flohackF mateo_saltaM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • flohackF Offline
          flohack @suoko
          last edited by

          @suoko the problem is that we bind-mount a lot of files, if an update comes across such a file then it cannot be updated. Thats also why apt is only used as an update method in development. In your case its probably Ok to ignore the error though.

          My languages: πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • mateo_saltaM Offline
            mateo_salta @suoko
            last edited by

            @suoko were you on dev channel before using the ubports qa tool?

            Z 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Z Offline
              zubozrout @mateo_salta
              last edited by

              @mateo_salta I am getting the same and am on the dev channel, so that's not it: https://forums.ubports.com/topic/3188/morph-browser-not-possible-to-show-map-due-to-missing-webgl/9?_=1627584581816 ... Is the ubports-qa command even available on stable/staging? I thought it is not present at all there.

              K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K Offline
                kugiigi @zubozrout
                last edited by

                @zubozrout It is but it's usually not recommended to use there especially if devel already has many changes compared to them. So it's safer when closer to an OTA release πŸ˜„

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • First post
                  Last post