UBports Robot Logo UBports Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved App Development
    27 Posts 4 Posters 650 Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
      • G Offline
        gpatel-fr @PhAndersson
        last edited by

        @PhAndersson said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):

        Are you sure /usr/lib/bluetooth/obexd does not exist on 24.04

        phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~$ ls /usr/lib/bluetooth/obexd
        ls: cannot access '/usr/lib/bluetooth/obexd': No such file or directory

        Well, that explains it then. When this upgrade from upstart to systemd, UT was still only on focal. When upgrading to 24.04, the path was not upgraded.
        On a standard Ubuntu 24.04 (not UT):
        apt-file list bluez-obexd
        bluez-obexd: /usr/lib/systemd/user/obex.service
        bluez-obexd: /usr/libexec/bluetooth/obexd
        bluez-obexd: /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.bluez.obex.service
        bluez-obexd: /usr/share/doc/bluez-obexd/changelog.Debian.gz
        bluez-obexd: /usr/share/doc/bluez-obexd/copyright

        yeah, that's a 24.04 thing. Before Ubuntu was putting the executable under /usr/lib.

        I have filed an issue on gitlab.

        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P Online
          PhAndersson
          last edited by

          There is progress. I'm happy to report that the D-Bus registration issue that manifested itself through the following error message:

          Error registering agent for the default adapter: QDBusError("org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown", "The name org.bluez.obex was not provided by any .service files")

          is resolved. My mistake. I tried to connect to OBEX over the system bus, when it runs on the session bus.

          Still no file transfer, though.

          Xiaomi Mi A2 (16.04 OTA-25/stable) with 2 SIMs
          Daily driver: Google Pixel 3a (20.04 OTA-11/stable) [was: Nokia N900 (Maemo) from 2009].

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P Online
            PhAndersson @gpatel-fr
            last edited by

            @gpatel-fr said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):

            @PhAndersson said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):
            yeah, that's a 24.04 thing. Before Ubuntu was putting the executable under /usr/lib.

            I have filed an issue on gitlab.

            Splendid! Many thanks.

            Xiaomi Mi A2 (16.04 OTA-25/stable) with 2 SIMs
            Daily driver: Google Pixel 3a (20.04 OTA-11/stable) [was: Nokia N900 (Maemo) from 2009].

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P Online
              PhAndersson @PhAndersson
              last edited by

              @gpatel-fr said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):
              EDIT: after some searching, and finding this github issue, I found the trick to add another override and after setting enable-linger for phablet with loginctl, the obex service is running after a restart.

              I just tried the enable-linger trick on 20.04:

              $ loginctl enable-linger
              

              then confirmed that it was set using

              $ loginctl user-status
              

              but after power-cycling the phone, the OBEX daemon still won't start automatically even though its unit file is still enabled.

              You mentioned "another override": was there something else to do?

              Xiaomi Mi A2 (16.04 OTA-25/stable) with 2 SIMs
              Daily driver: Google Pixel 3a (20.04 OTA-11/stable) [was: Nokia N900 (Maemo) from 2009].

              G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G Offline
                gpatel-fr @PhAndersson
                last edited by

                @PhAndersson

                the other override is needed because of the specific 24.04 problem, you should not need it.

                Maybe all that is needed is to enable again the service.

                What's the result of

                systemctl --user status obex

                also, is there a symbolic link to the service under ~/.config/systemd/user/default.target.wants ?
                if not systemd will not start it.

                P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P Online
                  PhAndersson @gpatel-fr
                  last edited by PhAndersson

                  @gpatel-fr said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):

                  @PhAndersson

                  the other override is needed because of the specific 24.04 problem, you should not need it.

                  OK -- thanks.

                  Maybe all that is needed is to enable again the service.

                  What's the result of

                  systemctl --user status obex

                  obex.service is still enabled -- here is the requested output:

                  ● obex.service - Bluetooth OBEX service
                       Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/user/obex.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
                      Drop-In: /usr/lib/systemd/user/obex.service.d
                               └─ubuntu-touch-session.conf
                       Active: inactive (dead)
                  

                  also, is there a symbolic link to the service under ~/.config/systemd/user/default.target.wants ?
                  if not systemd will not start it.

                  Well -- that's a good hint 🙂

                  As it turns out, the folder called ~/.config/systemd/user/default.target.wants does not exist at all. There is a folder called graphical-session.target.wants but the symlink is not there either. The symlink is created one level above, i.e. in ~/.config/systemd/user/. Here is the ls -l output:

                  total 20
                  lrwxrwxrwx 1 phablet phablet   34 Jan 15 10:50 dbus-org.bluez.obex.service -> /usr/lib/systemd/user/obex.service
                  -rw-rw-r-- 1 phablet phablet  768 Oct  4 16:55 dekkod-notify.service
                  -rw-rw-r-- 1 phablet phablet  716 Oct  4 16:55 dekkod.service
                  drwxr-xr-x 2 phablet phablet 4096 Mar 27  2025 graphical-session.target.wants
                  -rw-rw-r-- 1 phablet phablet  332 Mar 27  2025 osmscout-server.service
                  -rw-rw-r-- 1 phablet phablet  174 Mar 27  2025 osmscout-server.socket
                  

                  By way of comparison, on my laptop running openSUSE Leap 15.6, the OBEX symlink is created in the exact same place (and obexd successfully starts when I log in), so I don't know whether or not it's enough to explain why the service fails to start on the phone.

                  This being said, my app is now able to start obexd by itself if not running already, so that aspect has become less critical.

                  Xiaomi Mi A2 (16.04 OTA-25/stable) with 2 SIMs
                  Daily driver: Google Pixel 3a (20.04 OTA-11/stable) [was: Nokia N900 (Maemo) from 2009].

                  G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G Offline
                    gpatel-fr @PhAndersson
                    last edited by

                    @PhAndersson said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):

                    lrwxrwxrwx 1 phablet phablet 34 Jan 15 10:50 dbus-org.bluez.obex.service -

                    I have it too; it's a different thing, it's for the dbus part I think.

                    @PhAndersson said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):

                    my app is now able to start obexd by itself if not running already,

                    It may be possible to activate on demand, but I have no idea how.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P Online
                      PhAndersson
                      last edited by PhAndersson

                      OK, yet more updates.

                      As already indicated above, my app now successfully registers with D-Bus/OBEX:

                      [20/01/2026 13:50] Creating a QMirClientScreen now
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] reply QDBusMessage(type=MethodReturn, service=":1.28", signature="", contents=([]) )
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] creating agent on dbus
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] registering agent
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] discovering obex service
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] OBEX service not found, attempting D-Bus activation
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] OBEX service activated successfully
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] found OBEX service at: "org.bluez.obex"
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] registering agent on obexd-server
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] Agent registered successfully
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] have entries: (".", "..", "HubIncoming", "qmlcache", "qtshadercache-arm64-little_endian-lp64") "/home/phablet/.cache/ratatoskr.philipa"
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] file:///usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/qt5/qml/Lomiri/Components/1.3/Icon.qml:115:5: QML Image: Failed to get image from provider: image://theme/network-cellular-connected
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] QObject::startTimer: Timers cannot be started from another thread
                      [20/01/2026 13:52] file:///usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/qt5/qml/Lomiri/Components/1.3/Icon.qml:115:5: QML Image: Failed to get image from provider: image://theme/network-cellular-connected
                      [20/01/2026 13:52] file:///usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/qt5/qml/Lomiri/Components/1.3/Icon.qml:115:5: QML Image: Failed to get image from provider: image://theme/network-cellular-connected
                      [20/01/2026 13:52] qt.qpa.mirclient: Attempted to deliver an event to a non-existent window, ignoring.
                      

                      But when I start the app and try to push a file from the laptop to the phone over BT, obexd logs the following:

                      [20/01/2026 13:50] OBEX daemon 5.64
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] Excluding pcsuite
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] Excluding ftp
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] Excluding irmc
                      [20/01/2026 13:50] Excluding mas
                      [20/01/2026 13:51] CONNECT(0x0), <unknown>(0xff)
                      [20/01/2026 13:51] CONNECT(0x0), <unknown>(0x0)
                      [20/01/2026 13:51] PUT(0x2), <unknown>(0xff)
                      [20/01/2026 13:51] Agent replied with an error: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied, An AppArmor policy prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient; type="method_call", sender=":1.107" (uid=32011 pid=4463 comm="/usr/lib/bluetooth/obexd -P ftp,irmc,mas,pcsuite -" label="unconfined") interface="org.bluez.obex.Agent1" member="AuthorizePush" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" destination=":1.106" (uid=32011 pid=4460 comm="ratatoskr " label="ratatoskr.philipa_ratatoskr_260120124119 (enforce)")
                      [20/01/2026 13:51] PUT(0x2), Forbidden(0x43)
                      [20/01/2026 13:51] DISCONNECT(0x1), <unknown>(0xff)
                      [20/01/2026 13:51] DISCONNECT(0x1), Success(0x20)
                      [20/01/2026 13:51] disconnected: Transport got disconnected
                      

                      Looking in journal, another message is found right before the error reported by obexd, this one issued by dbus-daemon (here copied from an earlier test run):

                      Jan 15 16:44:14 hatshepsut dbus-daemon[2372]: apparmor="DENIED" operation="dbus_method_call"  bus="session" path="/test/agent" interface="org.bluez.obex.Agent1" member="AuthorizePush" name=":1.94" mask="receive" pid=5216 label="ratatoskr.philipa_ratatoskr_260115153557" peer_pid=3539 peer_label="unconfined"
                      

                      Clearly, the IPC between obexd and the agent registered by my app seems to be blocked by AppArmor. This is the current AA profile for my app:

                      {
                          "policy_groups": [
                              "bluetooth",
                              "networking",
                              "content_exchange",
                              "content_exchange_source"
                          ],
                          "policy_version": 20.04
                      }
                      

                      Can anyone tell me what could be missing?

                      Xiaomi Mi A2 (16.04 OTA-25/stable) with 2 SIMs
                      Daily driver: Google Pixel 3a (20.04 OTA-11/stable) [was: Nokia N900 (Maemo) from 2009].

                      G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G Offline
                        gpatel-fr @PhAndersson
                        last edited by

                        @PhAndersson said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):

                        AuthorizePush

                        this is denied; I never dabbled much with Apparmor, and certainly not with UT; I notice with some dismay that there are no apparmor logs and I have no clear idea on the better way to enable them unfortunately.

                        For now, I have only one positive thing to say: in the application that worked with 16.04, the template was set to 'unconfined'; while this is not generally a great idea, to advance your testing maybe it could be worth a try to add it to the apparmor profile ?

                        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P Online
                          PhAndersson @gpatel-fr
                          last edited by

                          @gpatel-fr said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):

                          For now, I have only one positive thing to say: in the application that worked with 16.04, the template was set to 'unconfined'; while this is not generally a great idea, to advance your testing maybe it could be worth a try to add it to the apparmor profile ?

                          Yes, you're right -- it's certainly worth a try.

                          Xiaomi Mi A2 (16.04 OTA-25/stable) with 2 SIMs
                          Daily driver: Google Pixel 3a (20.04 OTA-11/stable) [was: Nokia N900 (Maemo) from 2009].

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P Online
                            PhAndersson
                            last edited by

                            Well, good news! With the "unconfined" AA profile, the app works 🙂

                            The phone successfully received a .jpeg file sent over BT from my laptop:

                            screenshot20260121_110443517.png

                            Xiaomi Mi A2 (16.04 OTA-25/stable) with 2 SIMs
                            Daily driver: Google Pixel 3a (20.04 OTA-11/stable) [was: Nokia N900 (Maemo) from 2009].

                            G lduboeufL P 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • G Offline
                              gpatel-fr @PhAndersson
                              last edited by

                              @PhAndersson

                              Great ! have happy file exchanges with your car 🙂

                              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • lduboeufL Offline
                                lduboeuf @PhAndersson
                                last edited by

                                @PhAndersson said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):

                                Well, good news! With the "unconfined" AA profile, the app works 🙂

                                The phone successfully received a .jpeg file sent over BT from my laptop:

                                screenshot20260121_110443517.png

                                Congrats, So some changes are needed on UT to make it work ?

                                P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • P Online
                                  PhAndersson @gpatel-fr
                                  last edited by

                                  @gpatel-fr said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):

                                  @PhAndersson

                                  Great ! have happy file exchanges with your car 🙂

                                  That won't work yet, unfortunately. For this, I need the SharePlugin to work. That one still crashes as soon as I select it which causes the phone to restart.

                                  More troubleshooting needed 😕

                                  Xiaomi Mi A2 (16.04 OTA-25/stable) with 2 SIMs
                                  Daily driver: Google Pixel 3a (20.04 OTA-11/stable) [was: Nokia N900 (Maemo) from 2009].

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • P Online
                                    PhAndersson @lduboeuf
                                    last edited by

                                    @lduboeuf said in Trying to revive 'ubtd' (Bluetooth file transfer):

                                    Congrats, So some changes are needed on UT to make it work ?

                                    If your question is: did I need to hack my phone to make the app work in its current state, then the answer is no. As suggested by @gpatel-fr, I just gave it an "unconfined" AA profile (which I understand would prevent me from publishing it on the OpenStore).

                                    So eventually an updated bluetooth AppArmor Policy Group would be needed, I guess (or a extra one dedicated to OBEX).

                                    Xiaomi Mi A2 (16.04 OTA-25/stable) with 2 SIMs
                                    Daily driver: Google Pixel 3a (20.04 OTA-11/stable) [was: Nokia N900 (Maemo) from 2009].

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • P Online
                                      projectmoon @PhAndersson
                                      last edited by

                                      @PhAndersson I think any spawning of external processes that are not inside the app's ~/.local/share directory require unconfined. And in this case, unconfined would be required since it's using some system executable.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • First post
                                        Last post