How safe is UT from trackers?

AppLee

I don't think tracking is an issue and a responsibility of the OS.
As user you can act by choosing what online services you use.
Some plugins like on firefox can be nice to have sure, but it is not needed IMHO.

You talk about ads and tracking those are linked but very different.
If you want to block ads, yes uAdBlock is a solution (far from perfect, but good enough). About tracking... there is nothing you can do.
One cannot prevent any website to sell data they collected on you to a third party. But one can choose the website visited.
IP address is required on internet and so it can be used to track people behind the machine behind the address...

Tracking is not done only by javascripts running on a webpage. And the leaders in tracking people already work around the "blockers"...

Note : I don't try to influence you I'm just giving you my opinion about this topic.

A Former User

@adlinux And you can use the Onion-Browser

AdLinux

@thilov I've given that a go! I quite like it, but I feel that like uAdBlock it needs a bit more time to be perfect.

That said, any problems I have could be due to the build for my phone still being in development.

AdLinux

Hey @applee

I realise my initial comment could have come across as being accusatory towards UBports, I would just like to clarify that I don't think it is the responsibility of an OS to completely protect it's user from 3rd party trackers, that would be a logistical nightmare if it were even possible.

My position comes more from someone who is interested in Ubuntu Touch not only because it's a cool looking OS and that I like Linux, but as someone who wants to find a more private mobile OS, with the best thing I can use at the moment to achieve that goal being LineageOS (which is nice, but I would like to use something far less connected with Google by using something that isn't Android). Now I know I could opt for a feature phone, but I want a proper smartphone for the features it has. I know that some people see tracking in that sense as an inevitability, but I am someone who genuinely believes that you CAN have your cake and eat it.
(Also, usually someone brings up iPhones. I have a list as long as my arm as to why I hate Apple and will not use their phones, even if they are more private than an OEM Android ROM, which I don't use anyway).

I know that ads and trackers aren't always the same thing, and that if I don't see an ad that doesn't necessarily mean that I'm not being tracked. I just find them to be an easy way of gauging the potential level of tracking when I'm using a website. I know that even with good tracker blocking that there is still the possibility that some trackers have gotten through, I think it would be naive to think otherwise.

That all said, I do believe that trackers are a huge problem currently facing the tech world. I can see your argument about picking and choosing which websites to go to, and I'm not blind to the fact that I'm slightly hypocritical saying I take issue with tracking, but will happily watch YouTube. However, there are a lot of times where one can accidentally fall into a site that uses trackers without knowing that they are being tracked. For example, if I look up pictures of a car, find said picture and then go to the site to learn more, I could have easily stumbled onto a site which has now planted a tracker on me (usually a Google or Facebook tracker). THAT is why I believe that it is imperative for UBports to bring tracker blocking to the Morph browser (which should hopefully add it to all of the web apps, correct me if I'm wrong there).

With the web being how it is in the current day, I believe that ad/tracker blocking or the ability to have an extension made to do it for a browser is a necessity, a feature that should be included as standard. So, I'm hoping that soon this feature will become available for Morph, or when Anbox or Libertine begin to work on my phone, I will try an alternative browser like Firefox or Midori (and then hopefully create web apps through those browsers).

Once again, I would like to have my cake and eat it. I believe I have been able to achieve this for the most part with desktop GNU/Linux, I'm now hoping that the same can be achieved through mobile Linux OSs such as Ubuntu Touch.

Or I could just be wearing a tin foil hat...

Sorry for the essay lol

AppLee

@adlinux said in How safe is UT from trackers?:

Or I could just be wearing a tin foil hat...

LOL

I better understand your position.
And I agree that you should be able to eat your cake.

I don't really know much about trackers, but a simple solution I use to avoid tracking (as much as possible) is to use webapps.
So no need to include a somehow difficult feature to a complex app such as Morph Browser.

AFAIK, tracking frequently uses cookies (and maybe there already is an option to block cookies in Morph) and cookies are shared between tabs.
On desktop, I use private navigation in order to make a search on "untrusted" websites.

On mobile, I use webapps. If I want to buy something from amazon, I use a webapp and everything I do is kept at amazon level. Every information spill come from amazon and the data I willingly provided them.
When I do banking I also use a webapp so my bank doesn't know about my internet usage.
If I have to watch a video on youtube I also use a webapp and I make sure that no cookie is stored between sessions this way I don't end up with google building up a profile based on what they think I might be interested in.

The theory behind tracking is nice, but mostly they propose crap that I don't want. So I prefer to look for content all by myself. That's the freedom I get by using webapps.

I think the power of webapps is really underestimated for how you can manage your internet experience.

I hope this could help you in your endeavor.
What I wanted to point out is how difficult it is to define an tracker's blocker. My answer to that is webapp by prohibiting cookies to be accessed by anyone I don't want.

Cheers

Keneda

@applee said in How safe is UT from trackers?:

My answer to that is webapp

Your own webapps?

AntiDroid

Has anyone read the piece on tuxphones.com about Anonymity vs Privacy. I feel it is relevant to this thread because the two concepts are often referred to interchangeably but offer very different things.

AppLee

@keneda
It depends. It is easy enough for me to create my own as I have clickable already installed and configured.
If I didn't I would certainly use webber for example.

I personally find that there are too many webapps in the open-store.
So when I make my own I do not publish it.

Keneda

@applee said in How safe is UT from trackers?:

I personally find that there are too many webapps in the open-store.

That's not there are too many, that's there are too many that no longer works... ^^
But i agree with you, if everyone puts its own webapp that would be the jungle.

Today i searched for playstation webapp, i found one, then i clicked on publisher :
https://open-store.io/?sort=relevance&search=author%3Amar_k83
Most of them marked not functionning in coms, for sure it is 2 years old and for 15.04.

Those deprecated webapps (i mean, not only in this link) is not a good thing for openstore user experience.

TotalSonic

In partial answer to this question - here's the results of the security test at https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/ for all of the different browsers I have on my Volla Phone, with uAdBlock enabled.

Morph browser ->
Morph

Firefox-esr 78 running in Libertine container ->
Firefox

Roadtrip (alternative QtWebEngine based browser demo from Mateo Salta) ->

Onion (interestingly this one performed the worst in this test, despite being based on Tor, and supposedly providing enhanced security) ->
Onion

Best regards,
Steve Berson

3T_Ed

@totalsonic

OnePlus 3T + Morph Browser

mateo_salta

@3t_ed there are a bunch of qtwebengine flags we can use to reduce fingerprinting

AdLinux

I think there might be a discrepancy between different devices when it comes to the effectiveness of uAdBlock.

A lot of people have posted screenshots from their phones of the EFF's 'Cover Your Tracks' showing Morph blocking trackers (with the help of uAdBlock). However, I am having no such luck on my Sony Xperia 10.

Here are my screenshots (well they would be screenshots but instead they are photos, as the current build for the Xperia 10 doesn't seem to have MTP working yet).

Morph with uAdBlock:

Onion with uAdBlock:

Does anyone have any ideas as to why there is this discrepancy? Or how it could be solved?

AntiDroid

This post is deleted!

TotalSonic

@adlinux - yes, in retesting I am now getting the same results as you!! - not sure what is going on with this - but it is concerning.

Best regards,
Steve Berson

domubpkm

@totalsonic I think your uAdBlock is fully disabled even if you think it is activated and shows lists.
It can be the case for an OTA update or if you change of channel.
So first do 'deactivate uAdBlock' and then reactivate it: personally I check all the lists.
But it's right that for the Volla, we have always a NEARLY-unique fingerprint : i don't like this word nearly. This word is too much
@mateo_salta Why did you remove demo browser from the Open Store? Improving it would have been nice but it still has some use as it is for testing I think. Demo browser as a UNIQUE fingerprint!!

Moem

@domubpkm said in How safe is UT from trackers?:

I think your uAdBlock is fully disabled even if you think it is activated and shows lists.
It can be the case for an OTA update or if you change of channel.

Thank you for this, I had no idea!

domubpkm

@domubpkm said in How safe is UT from trackers?:

@mateo_salta Why did you remove demo browser from the Open Store? Improving it would have been nice but it still has some use as it is for testing.

Demo browser is back in the Open Store today. Thanks @mateo_salta .