Ubuntu Touch Q&A 115 Is This Saturday At 19:00 UTC

MrT10001

@nero355 I started writing a big response, but it tailed off to something that was pretty irrelevant to your response.
My previous question was explained in the Q&A 114, I think the main gist was the lack of developers or people who are going to maintain UT for older devices, which I really do get. I see why Canonical dropped UT as it is not a viable option cost wise but also people wise. At the end of the day you have to use your developers in an area that is going to make the company money and when you are competing with Google and Apple, you aren't going to win - Microsoft is a good example of that. Canonical did the right thing and threw it open to UBports for enthusiasts to take it on, which they have done with great gusto.

The other thing is I bet all the core developers get asked this all the time and when an upstart like myself asks the question, it is a case of here we go again and of course why don't you get into porting/ development. That is what i would like to do, I have a day job though that really takes up the majority of time (like probably most others) and when I started with processors on the Z80a, I have forgotten all the machine code and BASIC programming I did back then, life has really taken over.

@nero355 , I am with you on the Waydroid thing. Why try to run when we have just started walking. I think UT has become a bit fractious in its direction, it is trying to get too many devices to be ported onto - which is good, but has caused over extension.

I could go on, but I am beginning to digress... Again!

Talkless

Q/A question:

Why Bitcoin donation method is removed?

While UBPorts delivers freedom in the mobile computing sphere, Bitcoin on another hand provides similar freedoms in financial sphere (by being open, borderles, cencorship-resistant, neutral, etc, etc, also ran by FOSS and tenths of thousands volunteers) - a nice cooperation, ideologically, unless there is regulatory pressure for non-profit to avoid cryptocurrencies..?

Thanks!

Lakotaubp

@talkless
Edit.
Please see here https://forums.ubports.com/topic/7204/views-on-an-alternative-source-of-funding-via-tokens for possible reason why the Foundation cannot use this method or similar. Also this Q&A is finished your question will get missedthe next should be in two weeks time.

Keneda

@lakotaubp said in Ubuntu Touch Q&A 115 Is This Saturday At 19:00 UTC:

Please see here

Where ?

Lakotaubp

@keneda The link Thanks

Lakotaubp

@nero355 and @MrT10001 JFI WayDroid is now a totally seperate project to UBports and UT and as such is not a drain on resources.
As to whether it is good idea to run android apps on UT that is down to the individual themselves and in some cases maybe a way to avoid carrying two phones about. Don't forget in some places certain apps are all most if not already a requirement (covid ones for example). WayDroid maybe a good answer.

cliffcoggin

Thank you for releasing the list of legacy phones that will be supported by UB Ports after 20-04. I regret the Nexus 5 is excluded, but it is good to have some definite information on which to base a new purchase.

Moem

@cliffcoggin said in Ubuntu Touch Q&A 115 Is This Saturday At 19:00 UTC:

Thank you for releasing the list of legacy phones that will be supported by UB Ports after 20-04.

Where can I find that list please? I've listened to the entire Q&A but I still don't know which devices will be supported.

...Ooooh. wait... I think I get it. That was sneaky!

MrT10001

@lakotaubp I gather Waydroid is, but I have already had someone quite fervently pushing it when I recommended a basic device to get started on UT - in my opinion if you are starting out, start with the basics. Android apps is a nice "to have" but not vital for the core of UT yet.

stanwood

@mrt10001 I think it all depends on the user's needs.
Being able to install some Android applications on Ubuntu Touch is a benefit, not a requirement. This can be very useful in a professional context.

As @lakotaubp said very well, the development of WayDroid is not supported by the foundation, although some adjustments and patches may be necessary.
This also summarizes what Florian said last night at Q&A 115.

Freedom is indeed the motivating factor of GNU/Linux and that's why I like it.

stanwood

@moem @cliffcoggin Concerning the Nexus 5, theoretically, in its current state, it does not meet the requirements to be migrated on 20.04.

However, there is an experimental (and incomplete) port Halium 7.1

So all hope is not lost.

In any case, I trust the foundation to make the right decision, and whatever they decide I will always support them.

TotalSonic

@mrt10001 - my reply to the forum poster recommending more modern devices that supported Waydroid, over the older devices that you were recommending (that most likely will not even receive 20.04 support, potentially obsoleting them for UT use soon after the poster could acquire them) was in direct response to their post specifically asking for Android app support. Misconstruing that post as anything other than that is disingenuous, noting that I have used UT as my OS as daily driver mobile devices, previously solely using UT native apps, webapps and Libertine apps, for over 3 years, and have been an ardent promoter of UT native app options.

Beyond that - Waydroid offers many attractive additional app options on a few devices which are supporting it relatively well current but it certainly is in alpha state still, and I agree should not be construed as a cure all, or promoted above UT native app development as the ultimate best solution.

Best regards,
Steve Berson

UBportsNews

@aarontheissueguy Is it in the bloghttps://ubports.com/blog/ubports-news-1/post/ubuntu-touch-q-a-114-3795 or audio

Lakotaubp

@mrt10001 The great thing about UT is it can be what you want it to be. It is yours to do with as you want not what others tell you it is or to do with it.
Still all these discussions have thread on them already and this is not the right place to continue so please use the existing threads for further discussion.