uWolf (LibreWolf)
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy Options 1-4 are too detailed for small screens. Also the other new ones are more detailed than the current one.
The new ones are all very stunning, to be sure, but for legibility, I think the current one is better.
{EDIT: Just saw the modified icon, and that one actually fits better with the Suru style of UT. But if you want to avoid modified icons, then I guess adding some space around the original to avoid the clipping would be a good change as well.)
-
@arubislander i would say option 5 is what you mean.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy Very nice! My favourites are 5 and 6. The ones before that are too detailed, and 7 is too busy.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy Option5 is not too bad, but the fur on the wolve's neck is too much detail imho.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy said in uWolf (LibreWolf):
@arubislander i would say option 5 is what you mean.
I think he means this one:
Closest to number 5 here but not quite the same.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy I think also that the one shown by Moem is the one that fits Ubuntu Touch's design the best.
For reference:
https://docs.ubports.com/en/latest/humanguide/design-concepts/app-icon-design.html -
@ChromiumOS-Guy (round 2)
Looking at them close together, I actually like option 5 more, except for the fur on the neck. If that were smoothed out, that would be my pick. -
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy Option 5 without the fur and thanks for your work.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy No rush of course but can you say a few words about noble? I don't see any commits relating to it yet, so I assume a real wayland port is not done yet? Do we know if the current state still works on noble? Thanks.
