uWolf (LibreWolf)
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy Very nice! My favourites are 5 and 6. The ones before that are too detailed, and 7 is too busy.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy Option5 is not too bad, but the fur on the wolve's neck is too much detail imho.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy said in uWolf (LibreWolf):
@arubislander i would say option 5 is what you mean.
I think he means this one:
Closest to number 5 here but not quite the same.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy I think also that the one shown by Moem is the one that fits Ubuntu Touch's design the best.
For reference:
https://docs.ubports.com/en/latest/humanguide/design-concepts/app-icon-design.html -
@ChromiumOS-Guy (round 2)
Looking at them close together, I actually like option 5 more, except for the fur on the neck. If that were smoothed out, that would be my pick. -
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy Option 5 without the fur and thanks for your work.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy No rush of course but can you say a few words about noble? I don't see any commits relating to it yet, so I assume a real wayland port is not done yet? Do we know if the current state still works on noble? Thanks.
-
So have a question about security. I read that uWolf has unlimited access to the system. Isn't that a big security risk? How do you guys see that?
-
@rdfrs thats because apparmor rules (waiting for fix to trickle down to stable releases ask @Fuseteam he knows about this better then me)
confinment is mostly done, not a priority though because it will not raise security as much as you think only make it clearer to you the user what i am doing on you're phone, which granted is a very good reason and is why im working on it. (there is a branch with confinement implemented im just waiting until it won't break the app to use)
