Hello
Thank you for your answers.
I’m not sure where to start.
The contributions:
I started a list of bugs, missing translations, amazing behaviors or things that could be added.
But my skills are limited to VBA.
So I could only be another claimant and/or one more grumbler who will just point out what is not working (or does not work as he wants).
In addition, it would take me time to write correctly and constructively and then translate all this into English.
I would love a smartphone without Android and IOs and I’m more than sad to have seen the end of Windows Phone.
And I am ready to make my meager contribution to making things better.
But wouldn’t this time spent on UT be better spent in another Linux OS, just as full of promises and just as bad?
I know that UBports is not waiting for me to make it the third smartphone OS.
But spending time on something that doesn’t convince me...
If I came to Ubuntu Touch, it is because it seemed the least bad of the OS hacked from Linux and not Android.
But I am not convinced by the choices that were made or their results:
One of my contributions would be to point out that bad choices have been made for this OS.
I think spending time adding Android app support is time wasted and digging the grave of UT.
Libertine:
I don’t have the skills to develop anything (apart from user friendly interfaces for MS office software).
Above all, I find the existence of Libertine incomprehensible.
Most of our smartphones are ARM with a FullHD display.
There are at least one hundred desktop distributions that can be installed on this type of architecture.
If we added a zoom function on the screen, we could use any Debian App (since Ubuntu is Debian), right away.
I know there’s the driver problem.
But it seems mastered by Hardware Abstraction Layer since several mobile touch distributions manage to interact with the drivers and the hardware.
It would be "enough" to push the thing so that the current interface between hardware/drivers and OS is seen as an architecture recognized by Debian.
Debian and its derivatives would feel like they are installed on a touch-sensitive PC.
ØTimespansoul said in Usable phone display:
I see a lot of people trying to turn their phone into a laptop. Are you just wanting to do it to say it works? Seems like a strange workflow. Wouldn't work get done more efficiently on a pc?
The value of having a desktop software in your pocket rather than in a bag?
And even more amazing, "lot of people". Maybe there is a real wish, even more when we know that UT was launched on the theme of convergence and that the latest WinPhone were capable of this feat...
ØTimespansoul said in Usable phone display:
Spreadsheets on a phone sounds like a nightmare. Maybe I'm getting old.
Or you are not old enough!
Twenty years ago, it was possible to buy PDAs with a touch and lighted version of Windows and Office right from out of the box.
At this time, the PDA had to be constantly in standby and powered: turning it off or running out of battery meant a reset to its factory state.
Today, smartphones more powerful than desktop machines are not able to run office programs in a useful way.
Does the average smartphone user even at UT expect to be able to send SMS, call, take photos and install a thousand applications including 500 different social networks and 500 sales sites?
I want a smartphone on which I can do what I do on Debian machines.
If I need to do something, I look on the internet how it works on Debian, and I do the same thing on my smartphone.
I want editable settings pages.
That’s what I want.
By the way, I reset my tel to zero.
I created a new container and installed Gnuméric.
This one is launched from its icon but it always appears too small.
Libertine Tweak Tool does not change anything in this app.
At first, as I did not find the icon of Gnumeric after installation in the container.
The was the same for LibreOffice icons.
I guess it have to restart them to appear since they appeared after reboot.
Before I found this, I used the command given here:
https://docs.ubports.com/fr/latest/userguide/dailyuse/libertine.html
phabletØubuntu-phablet:~$ lomiri-app-launch focal_gnumeric_0.0
Started: focal_gnumeric_0.0
phabletØubuntu-phablet:~$
But at first, I didn’t pay attention and copied exactly what was recommended by https://docs.ubports.com/en/latest/userguide/dailyuse/libertine.html
phabletØubuntu-phablet:~$ lomiri-app-launch focal_gedit_0.0
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error' what(): Invalid app ID: focal_gedit_0.0
Aborted
phabletØubuntu-phablet:~$
So I tried, by mistake, to run Gedit instead of Gnumeric and it did not work.
But I didn’t realize my mistake immediately and so I tried other things to launch Gnumeric.
Which allowed me, despite myself, to discover a behavior that I am sure is not normal.
So the rest is a series of tests that are not necessary to solve my case, but which end with a helpful remark. I tried:
phabletØubuntu-phablet:~$ libertine-launch --id focal gnumeric --nologo
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libtls-padding.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (cannot open shared object file): ignored.
Unknown option --nologo
Lancez << gnumeric --help >> pour afficher une liste compète des options disponibles en ligne de commande.
phabletubuntu-phablet:~$
So yes, there is indeed a spelling mistake in "liste compète". It should be corrected in "liste complète".
I tried to:
phabletØubuntu-phablet:~$ libertine-launch --id focal gnumeric
Gnumeric opens.
It is no longer possible to write anything in the terminal (no more prompts).
Use gesture to close the terminal Gnumeric close: OK.
Use gesture to close gnumeric turn phone the phone off (poweroff): not OK and already mentioned above.
Once the phone is turned off in this way, you have to press the power button for more than 10s to turn it on again (poweron) while when it is turned off properly, (function turn off), it only takes a 3s press to turn it back on.
Symptoms:
Each time I use the command:
libertine-launch
AND
That I close the application so opened using the gesture, the phone turns off (poweroff)
AND
You must press the alim button for more than 10s to turn it on again (poweron).
I spent several hours writing the above and redoing tests to check that everything was going as I indicated.
I did some poses while doing research on other problems of my phone (notch and round corner for example).
And I found this:
https://ubports.com/fr/blog/ubports-blogs-et-nouvelles-1/post/ubuntu-touch-q-a-100-3754
There is this phrase: "Within the next four year period we need to get Lomiri working beautifully on desktops. That will be our second big contribution, after the phone OS."
A community that hopes to promote its smartphone OS focuses on developing a concept for desktops...
And worse, the paragraph "Smartphones should be a tool box" which explains, without wanting to, why UT has not evolved in functionality for years and is still not the Linux smartphone that so many people hope.
Thanks again.