uWolf (LibreWolf)
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy I do not consider uWolf usable on a daily basis under focal: too slow and no responsive interface. But well to test and it gives a good idea of uWolf's potential with noble.
-
@domubpkm indeed, I am currently trying to up the security by trying to make app confinement work if nothing else it will make it clear to the user what exactly am I accessing because I will still need some special permissions but this will become much more secure.
you can test the experimental confinement here, this has the same functionality as v0.10.30
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy said in uWolf (LibreWolf):
you can test the experimental confinement here, this has the same functionality as v0.10.30
Doesn't start again
-
@domubpkm can you give me the log from the logviewer app?
alsodmesg | grep DENIEDanddmesg | grep uwolf -
-
I'm loving uWolf so far but have a question. One thing I am having issues with is that I can't seem to copy and paste from any source such as another app like Morph or Jottit into the password box in uWolf when trying to sign into my Firefox account. It will allow me to copy/paste my email for my login but not the password. Is this expected behavior ? Was thinking it had something to do with X/11>mir issues but I have no idea.
Volla X23 on 20.04
-
@Simmonz - yes, this is a known bug at the OS level for Focal 20.04. Hopefully a fix will happen after Noble 24.04 is released.
-
@Simmonz this is the fix @TotalSonic is referring to (kind of) https://gitlab.com/ubports/development/core/qtmir/-/merge_requests/92
once this is upstreamed firefox and by extension LibreWolf will be able to use wayland directly.once its upstreamed I'm also planning on releasing my freetube port.
-
Hi someone by the name of AdamSchrey (on Github) created a bunch of nice Icons for uWolf and I would like to hold a vote on which one to choose from the icons he created the icons can be found here
the options (please reply to this with the option you like best):
EDIT: it seems the modified one and option 5 are the most popular worst case if the Librewolf team asks i'll just use option 5 again i doubt they will care though,(round 2) reduced options:
option 5option 5 (but without the fur, I or original creator will remove the fur)
modifed Librewolf Icon -
@ChromiumOS-Guy
Hello and many thanks for the work!
For me (from favorite to appreciated): Option 5 - Option 4 - Option 3 -
@ChromiumOS-Guy Options 1-4 are too detailed for small screens. Also the other new ones are more detailed than the current one.
The new ones are all very stunning, to be sure, but for legibility, I think the current one is better.
{EDIT: Just saw the modified icon, and that one actually fits better with the Suru style of UT. But if you want to avoid modified icons, then I guess adding some space around the original to avoid the clipping would be a good change as well.)
-
@arubislander i would say option 5 is what you mean.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy Very nice! My favourites are 5 and 6. The ones before that are too detailed, and 7 is too busy.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy Option5 is not too bad, but the fur on the wolve's neck is too much detail imho.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy said in uWolf (LibreWolf):
@arubislander i would say option 5 is what you mean.
I think he means this one:
Closest to number 5 here but not quite the same.
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy I think also that the one shown by Moem is the one that fits Ubuntu Touch's design the best.
For reference:
https://docs.ubports.com/en/latest/humanguide/design-concepts/app-icon-design.html -
@ChromiumOS-Guy (round 2)
Looking at them close together, I actually like option 5 more, except for the fur on the neck. If that were smoothed out, that would be my pick. -
-
@ChromiumOS-Guy Option 5 without the fur and thanks for your work.
