@domubpkm Ok, that is unfortunate.
Posts made by johndoe
-
RE: How to Force a Public Wi-Fi Network Login Page to Open?
-
RE: How to Force a Public Wi-Fi Network Login Page to Open?
@domubpkm @Lakotaubp I always use example.com and it always redirected me, if there was a login over an internal site required.
Maybe a script that checks, if a login is needed, could also use example.com. -
RE: ut-sysbench-qt-gui: Compare CPU performance of different devices
@dioginfo @ikoz @DJac @stefan_hdb
Thank you for the data. I will use it for the next update. But it could maybe take until next month for me to have time for it. -
RE: Volla X23 and UT-Tweek Tool
@MV I don't have a Volla X23, but the scaling probably works similar on most devices.
The steps in the question are maybe already the solution for you:... These devices (and maybe other devices) set the scaling in /etc/deviceinfo/devices/halium.yaml. In this file I changed "GridUnit" to a more convenient value (i.e. 28 on FP3 and 18 on Lenovo). To make these changes take effect it is not sufficient to just restart Lomiri with systemctl --user restart lomiri-full-greeter.service. You'll have to reboot the device...
-
RE: Ubuntu Touch Q&A 131 Call for questions
@UBportsNews What are the next big changes for Ubuntu Touch and what are the current problems for the Ubports team?
-
Making changes to the OS
Hello,
I don't know much about how Ubuntu Touch works, but I am using Ubuntu Touch on a Pixel 3a for some time now.
I would like to change some small things (mainly GUI related).
Unfortunately I could not find some big GitLab project "Ubuntu Touch for Pixel 3a" where I could edit some qml files, compile the project and install it to my device with the UBports Installer.Is there some easy way to make changes to the OS (like described above)?
Thank you for any help
-
RE: Bug with transparent apps and possible workarounds
@kugiigi Oh wow, so it is actually possible. I thought it would be a some complicated problem with Lomiri.
What is "side-stage" and how do I enable it? How would you need to hack Lomiri? -
Bug with transparent apps and possible workarounds
Hello,
I think, it would be really nice to have transparent apps. At least for a terminal or for a messenger it would be a nice feature, if you could see the Lomiri background you selected.
Unfortunately this does not seem to work on my device (Pixel 3a with 20.04 OTA-2) with following code:import QtQuick 2.6 import QtQuick.Window 2.2 import QtQuick.Layouts 1.3 import QtQuick.Controls 2.2 import Lomiri.Components 1.3 import Qt.labs.settings 1.0 ApplicationWindow { flags: Qt.FramelessWindowHint | Qt.WA_TranslucentBackground title: "Test-App" color: "#00000000" }
The black image is how the app actually looks like and the next picture right of it is the screenshot that probably appears white, because it is a picture with transparent colors. The app only gets actually transparent, when I go to the app overview.This problem also seems to exist with the terminal app for some time now:
https://gitlab.com/ubports/development/apps/lomiri-terminal-app/-/issues/57Is it for everyone like this or is this only on some devices the case?
As a workaround, it would be nice, if app developers could easily get the selected Lomiri background from somewhere and place it in their app as a background.
I tried:
gsettings get org.gnome.desktop.background picture-uri
But this only gave me the default background ('file:///usr/share/backgrounds/lomiri-default-background.png') and not the one, that was selected by me.
Does someone know where to find for the current background or does someone have a better solution?
-
RE: ut-sysbench-qt-gui: Compare CPU performance of different devices
@messayisto Yes, thank you. This helps to confirm, that the test result of the app is not comparable between different OS versions.
Just to be sure: You also did not turn the screen of your device off when the test was running?
-
RE: ut-sysbench-qt-gui: Compare CPU performance of different devices
Hello,
I moved this app from Ubuntu 16.04 to Ubuntu 20.04.
Some things changed with this and I am not sure, if the test is still consistent between versions (do to possible optimizations with 20.04 and a newer sysbench version).
I would be thankful, if some of you could install the app on a device with Ubuntu 20.04 and post the result after clicking on "Multiple Benchmarks".
Please do not switch to other apps or rotate the screen of your device while the test is running.
Should there be significant differences between OS versions, I will maybe need to consider this when working on the compare feature.
Thanks to everyone who helped me with this app and everyone who wants to help. -
lint: framework ... is not a supported framework ... is obsolete. Please use a newer framework
You will maybe get a message similar to
" - lint:framework 'ubuntu-sdk-24.04' is not a supported framework"
or
" - lint:framework 'ubuntu-sdk-13.10 is obsolete. Please use a newer framework"
when using Clickable.This message is about the defined SDK framework which the app will be built for. The definition of the framework in your project files allows Clickable to choose the correct docker image.
Frameworks that are supported now (April 2023) are for exampleubuntu-sdk-16.04.5
orubuntu-sdk-20.04
.But this frameworks will maybe be obsolete in the future and you will maybe want to check
https://clickable-ut.dev/en/latest/project-config.html#framework
and
https://clickable-ut.dev/en/latest/search.html?q=framework&check_keywords=yes&area=default
to get information about what SDK frameworks should be used and how to pass the information to Clickable.Should you get this message with a supported SDK framework, you maybe want to upgrade (
pip3 install --user clickable-ut --upgrade
) or reinstall Clickable:
https://clickable-ut.dev/en/latest/install.html
The commandclickable update-images
updates all Clickable docker images that have already been used. It does not update Clickable itself.If you want to know, where you defined the wrong framework, the command
grep -R framework ./
executed at the directory of your project could be helpful.
Please be aware, that you can also define the framework with an environment variable by executing Clickable:CLICKABLE_FRAMEWORK=ubuntu-sdk-20.04 clickable...
.Checking out the source code of other projects, can maybe also give you an idea, where you made a mistake in your project.
-
RE: Phone no longer charges since latest OTA update
When a Xiaomi Mi A2 I used did not charge anymore or only very slowly, the problem was fixed by using a different USB cable and a stronger charger.
The old USB cable and charger still worked perfectly fine with other mobile phones, so this was clearly an issue with the Xiaomi Mi A2.
This was under Android, so I think this is a hardware problem, that can appear after some time. -
RE: ut-sysbench-qt-gui: Compare CPU performance of different devices
@ikoz thank you really much. I was offline for some time and did not see your post, but I will add this data to the app with the next update.
-
RE: ut-sysbench-qt-gui: Compare CPU performance of different devices
@s710 @s710 When you click on the button "Export and Compare", you should see a diagram that compares your device with other devices and the test results of your device will also be saved to your clipboard. If you want to export the shown diagram, you could take a screenshot (pressing power up and down at the same time or hold the power button and select "Screenshot" in the Lomiri power menu). You will also find what is shown in the app under:
~/.cache/ut-sysbench-qt-gui/messages/temp_message.txtThe text file under "~/.cache/ut-sysbench-qt-gui/messages/temp_message.txt" should look something like this after you performed a CPU test and clicked on "Export and Compare":
The results of the performed tests have been copied to your clipboard 📋 (you can paste it into text fields of other apps or websites). Comparison CPU Benchmark (2 threads): Xiaomi Mi A2 | 1717 events/second ...█████████████████████████ Cosmo Commun. | 1652 events/second ...████████████████████████ M10 Tab + 2.gen | 1235 events/second ...██████████████████ Volla Phone | 1091 events/second ...████████████████ Xperia X | 1035 events/second ...███████████████ Pixel 3a | 918 events/second ...█████████████ Pinephone | 620 events/second ...█████████ Librem 5 (PureOS) | 596 events/second ...████████ Nexus 5 | 58 events/second ...█ Nexus 4 | 57 events/second ...█ This device | 57 events/second ...▒ Meizu MX4 | 52 events/second ...█ bq E5 | 46 events/second ...█ Comparison CPU Benchmark (8 threads): Cosmo Commun. | 5287 events/second ...█████████████████████████ Xiaomi Mi A2 | 4915 events/second ...███████████████████████ M10 Tab + 2.gen | 4005 events/second ...███████████████████ Pixel 3a | 3973 events/second ...██████████████████ Volla Phone | 3788 events/second ...██████████████████ Xperia X | 2467 events/second ...███████████ Librem 5 (PureOS) | 1191 events/second ...██████ Pinephone | 1190 events/second ...██████ Meizu MX4 | 146 events/second ...█ Nexus 4 | 113 events/second ...█ Nexus 5 | 96 events/second ...█ bq E5 | 91 events/second ...█ Comparison Memory Benchmark (no armhf devices): Xiaomi Mi A2 | 5849 MiB/second ...█████████████████████████ Librem 5 (PureOS) | 5511 MiB/second ...███████████████████████ Pixel 3a | 2560 MiB/second ...███████████████████████ M10 Tab + 2.gen | 2443 MiB/second ...████████ Cosmo Commun. | 2300 MiB/second ...████████ Volla Phone | 2250 MiB/second ...███████ Pinephone | 815 MiB/second ...█ Xperia X | 795 MiB/second ...█ Comparison Mutex Benchmark (less time is better): Librem 5 (PureOS) | 16.1842 seconds ...█████████████████████████ Meizu MX4 | 3.8107 seconds ...█████ Nexus 5 | 2.7758 seconds ...███ Nexus 4 | 2.4609 seconds ...███ bq E5 | 2.4057 seconds ...███ Volla Phone | 1.8590 seconds ...██ M10 Tab + 2.gen | 1.8361 seconds ...██ Xperia X | 1.6159 seconds ...██ Cosmo Commun. | 1.2297 seconds ...█ Xiaomi Mi A2 | 1.1919 seconds ...█ Pinephone | 1.0368 seconds ...█ Pixel 3a | 0.9193 seconds ...█ The shown benchmarks only give a rough idea about a device's performance and do not fully represent the everyday performance of a device.
-
RE: ut-sysbench-qt-gui: Compare CPU performance of different devices
@moncon Thanks, I think you can touch and hold a text field and then tap "Paste" to paste the text, that you have in the clipboard (but I see that you somehow managed to get the data of the Pinephone into your comment). It is good to see that the results are overall consistent with other phones from the same model.