@stanwood said in Call for testing: Ubuntu Touch 20.04 OTA-10: So, how will the update be rolled out to users on the stable channel? (OTA-9). Will they first receive the update to 20.04 OTA-10, then immediately afterwards the update to 24.04-1.0? Or will they have the choice between the 20.04 OTA update and the 24.04-1.0 update? I must admit that I myself am a bit lost in all this 20.04 OTA-9 users will first receive 20.04 OTA-10 as an usual update. After that, they'll be offered an upgrade to 24.04-1.0. Users can choose whether to upgrade or not. I'll try to make this more clear in our release announcement blog.

@poVoq Unfortunately, that's very dependent on the device, I can do it with my OP5 and my Sennheiser BT headphones

Ubuntu Touch 20.04 OTA-9 is released. Thank you everyone involved in the testing. https://ubports.com/blog/ubports-news-1/post/ubuntu-touch-ota-9-focal-release-3962

@peat_psuwit Thanks!

Ubuntu Touch 20.04 OTA-8 is released. Thank you everyone involved in testing. https://ubports.com/blog/ubports-news-1/post/ubuntu-touch-ota-8-focal-release-3953

@peat_psuwit said in On the subject of Ubuntu Touch versioning scheme: We've considered 24.04 OTA-x.y. Unfortunately, (re-)using the word OTA could set the wrong expectation; by using the word OTA, many users will expect incremental, frequent updates (AKA rolling release). Don't worry, users will expect unicorn rainbow farts anyway and while updates are a bit slow, technically UT is a rolling release I'm really sorry that you have this sentiment. I also don't want to change the versioning scheme, but both the technical and practical reasons forced us to re-think how we will version Ubuntu Touch. Don't be, it was mostly a joke, and, while I may not fully agree with the reasoning, it is overall a pretty minor change. I've been on the other side of this experience plenty of times. As a user I get upset about minor changes because they make up a much "larger" part of the user experience vs the experience as a developer where this is an "insignificant" side quest compared to all the development work actually being done Also compare this change to the hot mess that is the current naming schemes from both intel and AMD

There is No update after February 25 for noble next.

@peat_psuwit I overlayed touch.pa for two reasons: to make bluetooth calls work more reliable. So this one maybe get fixed by the MR. to make wired headphones work. For this it was needed to explicitly add the rate=48000 parameter to the load-module command: https://gitlab.com/ubports/porting/community-ports/android10/fairphone/fairphone_fp3/-/blame/halium-10.0-focal/overlay/system/etc/pulse/touch.pa?ref_type=heads#L55

Just wanted to say thank you! OTA-7 arrived tonight on my Redmi Note 9S and I applied it successfully. All seems perfectly fine. So thank you for continuous hard work!

@Lakotaubp It also got the error a few weeks ago then I just tried it again and it worked. Anyway, let's see if there's any news about it

@rocky58 said in CI is now fixed and freeze is lifted: Evidently I am still on the road to ignorance. As we all are. And if never had to work with git that's no surprise. But nowadays most projects I encounter made use of git (can be on-prem, github, gitlab, bitbucket, ...) For a long time I only knew about subversion

@AdhithAdhi I already answered in your other post. Sadly your device has not been ported to focal (yet?).