I am using UT for over 10 years now. I use it because I do NOT want to use Android.
While the base systems functioning are neglected, focus lies on Waydroid and things.

Since I can hardly use a Browser, Mail Client, Chat Client, etc. on UT itself I can use everything on Waydroid.
But if things only work on Waydroid I can use an Android Phone without that battery drainage...

There's Libertine and Snap support which don't help with the mobile experience. If I want to have a tablet or laptop, I use a tablet or laptop.
Convergence is good as a bonus, if the basis works. It's called Ubuntu Touch, but touchable is nothing. Don't forget, that this is about phones.

I think focus got lost. I hope you don't get mad at me for this. Hope you can see it at least a bit from my perspective.

E.g. I am sorry, telling me, that a really working browser can be expected with 26.04. is not enough, for nobody.
Neither is the information a "Interim" browser is coming, but no information when or what it is capable of.
I was accused of nagging when I tried to talk about this. Ok, here is still one point that justifies it:

You can develop this in any direction you want, but then don't sell it as something it is not and make people buy expensive devices they can't use.

I asked people to hypothetically switch from Android/IOS to UT and choose a device. They got on your website and mostly chose devices you can buy with UT preinstalled, means expensive.
The website says, the experience is comparable to other OSes on the market.
I then gave them my devices to try. Though I told them not to expect a replacement for Android/IOS, most of them would just feel scammed, since the phones are unusable without Waydroid. But as I said, then you don't need UT but and Android phone.

Efforts should IMO go into development of things the community needs to have a usable device without Android support and these are basic apps.

I contributed. But I don't wanna do that if development goes into a wrong direction. Why do the few resources you have and emphasise develop things the community does not really need instead of a useful base system and necessary features and apps?

That doesn't mean I don't appreciate the hard work to bring the system up to 20.04 and 24.04. I do and I know it is an insane amount of work. But what to do with it if I can hardly use it as daily driver?

It's because efforts go into features developers believe are cool. Nothing wrong about that, but then you should stay in this bubble of enthusiasts and don't make people from outside who want to escape Android, buy expensive devices that are hardly usable by suggesting wrong facts.

I got more than one Pinephone, which work better out of the box since I can install any app I want from the OSes sources or even flatpaks. And they mostly do scale! No need for Android or Waydroid though even that is possible. But it's not necessary and that's the difference.

Now, with Droidian, there's a good part of the same hardware available. I flashed it onto my Pixel 3a XL. Works. No Waydroid nessecary.

Oh yeah, banking apps. I you feel the need to trust any phone with banking, you need Android/Waydroid. But is that the most important thing to get running?

So please give me a reason not to leave UT which I still love and would prefer but can hardly use?
And please justify for the people who are not willing or able to start flashing phones and paid a lot of money for bad working phones, why you promote them and advertise them...

Please don't be mad at me. I spent so much patience, money, efforts... I just want a working phone by now and that was but isn't UT any more...

I am just a Linux user, but UT is the only system I encountered yet, that doesn't allow me to use a package manager freely. Everything would be perfect if that was possible...at least I guess so...

Nevertheless, thanks for everything...

@AppLee I get all that and I am aware.
I am on board as a user since UT started. I always had patience and understanding and supported people if possible.

For the following I want tosay first, that I have no insights and mught not be aware of certain things.

I refer to as what UBorts presents itself on the web. An alternative OS for anybody.
I am sure I am not the only one who read stories of people trying UT for some time and then switching back to their former OS since they were disappointed.
Mostly this is, because they simply have no clue of what they hold in their hands.
But the people I know using Android or IOS I couldn't convince even one to switch to UT though for me it's the best.

On the device site I read "Runs very smoothly without any flaws. The experience on this device will be comparable to other mobile OSes on the market."

That's simply not true for an average user which UBPorts want to reach. Or amI getting this wrong?

Also my impression is, that the focus of developers often is on things important to them, not the community. There are often things in Q&As I thought about "nice" but doesn't bring the user experience for the average user forward, since he doesn't even get in touch with it.

I hope you get my point.

So maybe UBPorts should name it an OS for people who are willing to renounce and wait if something doesn't work.
But that is not a ready OS comparable to others on the market. You can't expect people to jump on the train if the train doesn't roll (browser, mail,...). In my opinion some priorities over the last years were not set right.

Please please don't get me wrong. I just want to clarify this for me and once and for all. I don't want bad blood.
I consider myself as an average user UBPorts want to gather more of.
I also don't have time to read and inform me about everything and other average users may behave similar. Therefore I might have gotten things wrong...?
So I wonder if UT is for me or just for really skilled people.

This not meant to disrespect the work of the developers. The opposite is the case, I wish I was that skilled! It's just about the direction and decisions I know too little about!

I'd love to help. I have basic coding skills, but I simply have no time. So I report experiences as a normal user with needs, developers maybe don't always see. I buy devices of Volla who help developing and donate to UBPorts.
That's what I can do.

I tried e.g. Volla OS and other degoogled OSes. I avoid apps wherever possible and do things in the browser. I don't really like Android. But basic stuff works on all those OSes, even on Mobian or postmarketOS on the Pinephone (which simply lags hardware). I know, one could write books now on why that is so.

My point is: If UT is praised as working OS for average people, then it should be that. In my opinion, it was, but isn't any more though it could.
It should state, what andfor who it really is.
If that disqualifies me as a welcome user, I accept that I am wrong and won't bother anyone here any more...

I really hope, I expressed myself right. I want to stay part of this and I was simply asking for a solution until a new browser is coming.
I am willing to wait but can't get along without a browser. So what am I supposed to do? This is my question...

Thank you for your comments.

I feel my position is so hard to explain and whenever I try it feels like failure.

I am reading so much and try to gather information, yet I get the feeling I know nothing. I consider myself a normal user though I have a little programming background which helps me to understand some things or to help myself in some cases.
Ubuntu Touch targets "normal" people, right? So I don't know if I am about to reproach myself for the fact that I don't exactly know who develops what and who exactly is responsible for what.
Maybe I can gather a better overview somewhere?

My reality (the one of a normal user) is, that I have several phones running Ubuntu Touch. I was able to use them as my only daily driver. For a long time I didn't even have an Android phone.
But the eco system mostly has one app for one need. Over time, developers/maintainers dropped support for whatever reason.

E.g. me and most people I know communicate over Matrix servers. We got Cinny. Cinny starts failing more and more (e.g. emoticons and symbols are not usable any more). I read, the dev had to drop it due to health reasons. I wish him all the best. But that leaves me with the only alternative to use a web based client. That's not optimal due to notifications not coming up.

I was depending more and more on web apps and therefore on the browser, which is totally ok for me. The browser became the most important app to me - the browser, the only app keeping UT alive and usable (at least for me). If you are told then, that the browser's increasing failing on sites is not easily solved but we're not really doing something about it until 26.04., it's pretty annoying. Especially because I think one could have seen that coming. And I feel the solution is not to tell average users to use Waydroid.

What do you tell people who bought an expensive phone with the promise of an experience comparable to other OSes on the market, to explain this?
I counted on Volla phones, since they are new and come pre-installed and have a company as maintainer... But it's not an advantage. Compared to the Pixel 3a it's not worth it.

Another point concerning Volla is, that the UBPorts installer fails on 90% of attemps to flash a Volla Phone. I got all 4 Volla phones, all running UT by now, so in this case I know what I'm talking about.
That leaves me with expensive hardly usable phones, that will likely brick on the attempt to flash something else. I went through a lot concerning this.
I do not have too much money. Each time a new phone was released I was hoping, the UT is running better on it and I saved money to buy it. And I could distribute them in my family or even sell to colleages and convert more android users. But in that state, I can't convince them.

I spend so much money, time and effort in getting things to work, I just don't want that any more, because I am buying phones ready for end users, right? I shouldn't have to bother with half of the stuff not working. If I buy a Pinephone, they write there in red, that everything is in a beta state and might not be usable as daily driver.
The UBPorts website says more or less everything works fine. I think the Pine64 hint would be more suitable right now.
And even though I know, that Volla has most of the money for the phones I bought, I'd like to get what was promised and what I paid for and that's my point. In case of Pinephones, I knew before, what to expect and that's ok since these phones don't even cost half the price.

Then I listen to Q&As and so on and it all seems to be about things just not necessary to make the basic system just work.

So how does the future look? Will I have a working browser again?
Will I have a touch phone again? What about the other stuff? Maybe you should directly ask the community, what really is needed and concentrate on that. I can't imagine I'm the only one having these issues. And as I said, before I have to do 80% of my stuff within Waydroid, which sucks my battery empty in no time, I just use an Android phone.

I hope you get my point. And the questions, as a not too deep involved person are:

1. Why can't I just install apps like on any Linux system? Is that prevented by design or is that just not possible?
   You know, the pinephone works better concerning this, but lacks hardware. Can't these two approaches just come together?
   There's Mobian on the Pinephone. Ubuntu is based on Debian. Is Ubuntu Touch an own thing or still based on Debian?

2. Why don't I have the "freedom to break my device"? It feels like using and Android phone with the Termux App is the same linux experience at the surface for people like me.

3. If Volla sells a UT phone, what do the developers/maintainers of Volla do and what exactly does UBPorts? Where exactly is the deviding line? Who is doing what on such a port?

4. Why does the focus lie on convergence? As I said before, we have Libertine and Snaps, without any usage on a touch device. At least my devices get hot when trying to use them as a PC. So the question is just why? While the rest of the system needs caring so badly.

And here we close the loop since I'm back at the beginning. Who does develop what and why? and what's the future looking like?

If I could get back the money for the phones, I'd sell them immediatly. I'd just have a Pixel 3a and check by from time to time to see how things go. But since that is not going to happen and besides the fact that I was dumb enough to buy them, I just wonder what to do now (remember: flashing another OS fails on those phones in 3 of 4 times. I'm done with that) (keep an eye on ebay).

So what would be your advice for someone like me who bought phone after phone believing it's getting better on the next one? As a non involved person, should I have seen that coming? How could I have known that? Or could I and I was too blind? Too dumb? In my opinion here's clearly a lack of communication and information - for avaerage users at least, you're aiming at.

I wish I could help by getting into app development, but the apps I need are not currency converters... To be able to do something about the really important apps I would need way more knowledge, time and experience.

I am the first to contribute again with money, if I get a working touch device again...

Thanks for reading until yout got until here!!!

As a last step I tried switching channels now which also did not lead to success.

And as a very last step I did a factory reset after which the app worked again.
I don't know which data were responsible at the end, but all actions spared it. Only deleting ALL user data helped. Maybe someone else has a clue.

Though I have to set up everything again, I'm happy the music app is back. I'll cautiously set up Waydroid this time and check after every step if the Mmusic app still works. Maybe I'll be able to identify at least the action causing this issue.

I'll mark this as solved for now.

Volla Phone Quintus (20.04 OTA-8 Stable)

No issues so far, seems to work fine!

For me it also feels more performant. That's great!

A big THANK YOU to the dev team!

Got it. Forgot to secure that domain, so the URL started with http instead of https which I always typed. Secured it and now it works.
Sorry I bothered you!

I purchased a Volla Phone on Indiegogo. Looking forward to delivery

It seems, there are not many Quintus running Ubuntu Touch out there and since I have been asked about working features I thought I'd make an entry here for those who are interested.
Since there's no Quintus sub section, yet I write it here until it can be moved to its according place.

I took this list from the Ubuntu Touch device page.
I don't have the device for a very long time, so I will update things marked "untestet" ().
These are my personal observations on stable channel (OTA-8).

Actors:
:white_heavy_check_mark: Manual brightness
:white_heavy_check_mark: Torchlight
:white_heavy_check_mark: Vibration

Camera:
:white_heavy_check_mark: Flashlight
:white_heavy_check_mark: Photo
:white_heavy_check_mark: Video
:white_heavy_check_mark: Switching between cameras

Cellular:
:white_heavy_check_mark: Carrier info, signal strength
:white_heavy_check_mark: Data connection
:white_heavy_check_mark: Incoming, outgoing calls
MMS in, out
:white_heavy_check_mark: PIN unlock
:white_heavy_check_mark: SMS in, out
Change audio routings
Voice in calls
:white_heavy_check_mark: Volume control in calls

Endurance:
:white_heavy_check_mark: 24+ hours battery lifetime
7+ days stability

GPU:
:white_heavy_check_mark: Boot into UI
:white_heavy_check_mark: Hardware video playback

Misc:
AppArmor patches
:white_heavy_check_mark: Battery percentage
Offline charging
:white_heavy_check_mark: Online charging
Recovery image
Reset to factory defaults
RTC time
Shutdown / Reboot (see bottom)
Wireless External monitor
:white_heavy_check_mark: Waydroid

Network:
:white_heavy_check_mark: Bluetooth
:white_heavy_check_mark: Flight mode
Hotspot
NFC
:white_heavy_check_mark: WiFi

Sensors:
Automatic brightness
:cross_mark: Fingerprint reader
:white_heavy_check_mark: GPS
:white_heavy_check_mark: Proximity
:white_heavy_check_mark: Rotation
:white_heavy_check_mark: Touchscreen
:cross_mark: Double touch to wake

Sound:
Earphones (see bottom)
:white_heavy_check_mark: Loudspeaker
:white_heavy_check_mark: Microphone
Volume control (see bottom)

USB:
MTP access
ADB access

Reboot not always working. The screen turns off but it doesn't come back again. Hard reboot is necessary.

Bluetooth earphones work. The USB-C to 3.5mm adapter that came with the phone works, too. Another one I tested does not work. So this depends on hardware.

When listening to Music in the Music App, sometimes sound goes completely down on switching tracks. Same happens occasionally when switching position in the video app.

In some cases, but especially after the container has been frozen, Waydroid does not start again after having been closed/stopped. The only workaround working for me is running

systemctl restart waydroid-container

in the terminal (sometimes twice). Then Waydroid will start again.

@arubislander Thank you. I learned a lot in this thread and understand things better now.

I want to thank everybody for their patience and the hard work. This helps to appreciate it even more.

You could catch on here: https://github.com/SPIRIT-org/SPIRIT

@gpatel-fr I feared you'd say that. But I thought I ask anyway. Nevertheless, thank you so much! Yet, that helped me a lot.

@gpatel-fr The typo seems to have resulted from typing too quickly when I wrote this.

$ GDK_DPI_SCALE=2 snap run gimp

did solve half of the problem. All fonts are accordingly bigger and very good to read. Thank you for this!

However, all Buttons with their symbols on them (e.g. tool selection, layer selection,...) stay tiny.
Is there way to tweak this, too?

Maybe the terminal output is any help?

 $ snap run gimp

(gimp:5667): Gdk-WARNING **: 17:13:55.133: Failed to read portal settings: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.freedesktop.portal.Desktop was not provided by any .service files

(gimp:5667): dbind-WARNING **: 17:13:55.167: AT-SPI: Error retrieving accessibility bus address: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.a11y.Bus was not provided by any .service files
set device 'Wayland Touch' to mode: disabled
set device 'Wayland Pointer' to mode: disabled

(gimp:5667): IBUS-WARNING **: 17:13:59.655: Failed to mkdir /home/phablet/snap/gimp/557/.config/ibus/bus: Not a directory

(gimp:5667): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 17:13:59.662: Error creating IO channel for /proc/self/mountinfo: Permission denied (g-file-error-quark, 2)

(gimp:5667): Gdk-WARNING **: 17:14:00.405: Server is missing xdg_foreign support
gimp_widget_set_handle_on_mapped: gdk_wayland_window_export_handle() failed. It will not be possible to set windows in other processes as transient to this display shell.

(gimp:5667): Gdk-WARNING **: 17:14:00.406: Server is missing xdg_foreign support
gimp_widget_set_handle_on_mapped: gdk_wayland_window_export_handle() failed. It will not be possible to set windows in other processes as transient to this display shell.

(gimp:5667): Gdk-CRITICAL **: 17:14:06.972: gdk_wayland_window_unexport_handle: assertion 'impl->display_server.xdg_exported_v2 || impl->display_server.xdg_exported_v1' failed

Hi,

I'm running UT (24.04-1.2) natively on a Volla Tablet (no dual boot).
I installed some snap apps like Gimp and LibreOffice. They work great with one exception:

The workspace scales to a normal size and works perfectly. But the menu bar as well as all menus around the work area (where you choose e.g. tools in Gimp or fonts or text styling in LibreOffice) are tiny and it's hard to work with.

I tried different UI settings from within the apps (like screen resolution in DPI from Gimp settings) without any effect.

I tried to tweak that with UT Tweak Tool without success.

I tried to run these apps from terminal with settings like

$ GDK_SCALE=2 GDK_DPI_SCCALE=0.75 snap run gimp

and

$ snap connect gimp:gtk-3-themes :gtk-3-themes

Also no success.

Is there any way to tweak this? Thank you!!!

I have experienced issues on my Quintus:

The bluetooth gui does not see my headsets when searching for devices. But I can directly pair them using bluetoothctl and their hardware identifier.
After having done this, they seem to stay saved in the list of paired devices, since they auto connect from then on.
Yet, the quintus does never show the headsets in the GUI (one are Volla buds, the other is no name).
The Pinetime in contrary works without issues and is always visible in the list.

I can't remember having these issues before which makes me think that is connected to Noble.
My phone is running UT natively, no dual boot.

Maybe this can be added to observations made on Noble that might be addresed at some point.

I have experienced issues on my Volla Phone:

Bluetooth works normal at first. But when no audio is streamed for some time (e.g. your local playlist is over), the phone turns bluetooth off. When I turn it back on, I can't connect to the headsets again (tried with Volla Buds and a no name headset). I have to reboot the device to make bluetooth work again.
It looks like the GUI switch indicates bluetooth is enabled but I think it's not.

I can't remember having these issues before. Therefore I think it's a Noble issue.
My phone is running UT natively, no dual boot.

Maybe this can be added to observations made on Noble that might be addresed at some point.

Libertine funktioniert meines Wissens auf Noble nicht zwingend richtig. Du hast nativ Snap Support, also Anwendungen wie Libre Office, Gimp usw. kannst du direkt als Snap installieren.
Die Menüs sind sehr klein, aber die Arbeitsbereiche skalieren normal, man kann ganz gut damit arbeiten.
Soviel im Moment von meiner Seite...

EDIT: Dual Boot funktioniert meines Wissens nach nur mit Volla OS, von dem aus man mit dem Volla Boot Manager UT als Zweitsystem einrichten kann, nicht umgekehrt

For me it also feels more performant. That's great!

A big THANK YOU to the dev team!

@pparent said in VP22 Upgrade from 24.04-1.0 to 24.04-1.1 failed:

@jojumaxx

Does that work without having developer options enabled?

Normally yes, it's unrelated if we're talking about Ubuntu Touch developer mode.

Have you tried to boot with long push on "power" and "volume up" buttons at the same time, until you see a "Recovery Menu", then select the first option "Boot recovery", then connect it in USB to the installer? For me it is detected by the installer only this way.

Thank's for reporting this bug, I'm honestly a bit cautious about upgrading my own VollaPhone 22, since there were similar reports in pre-release, and apparently still now. Anyone can report it the upgrade worked for them?

Thank you so much, that worked.
The installer recognised the phone as Volla Phone 22 (mimameid) again, immediatly. Flashing went smooth, without problems and Yumi was normal sized again during installation (I don't know if that matters or is of any interest).
My Volla Phone 22 is on 24.04-1.1 stable now, too.

While this went smooth on my Volla Phone and Volla Phone X, the upgrade from 24.04-1.0 to 24.04-1.1 failed on my Volla Phone 22.

I'm on stable channel and startet the upgrade process from the updater in the settings.
It rebooted and the normal update applying screen showed (Yumi was tiny compared to the other phones).
It rebooted again and got stuck at the Volla logo. After an hour I turned it off because it got pretty warm.
Now, after turning it on, I see the Volla logo and then the screen starts flickering and nothing else happens.

What am I supposed to do now?

I had issues with this phone before, Volla support helped me to solve. Since then, the installer doesn't recognise the phone as Volla Phone 22 any more.
Nevertheless, that was in 16.04 times and all upgrades (to 20.04, to 24.04 and those in between) went yet smooth since then...
So in case of using the installer I have to choose it manually...

Should I try the installer?
Does that work without having developer options enabled?

Thanks in advance!