@Clementine SturmReader is the my eReader of choice on UT.

The best way to make it better is to contribute code towards the features you would like to see.

If you cannot code, then the next-best way is to sponsor someone to implement the desired features.

@Daryl said in Private Internet Access App:

Will tHIS VPN set up let me surf on my tablet safely and really privately?

Depends what you mean by 'safely'. A VPN will not protect you from accidentally downloading malware, for instance. Also depends what you mean by 'privately'. Even if you use a VPN and then log in to Facebook or Google or where ever else you log in to. They can potentially track you via cookies placed in your browser. A VPN does not protect your privacy from the sites you visit, it simply 'protects' your IP address.
What it does do is stop your ISP from being able to track your network traffic.

A VPN is a Virtual Private Network between your VPN client and the VPN server. Any traffic between the two is encrypted and secure. Any site you visit while your VPN connection is active, it will seem to them that you are browsing from the VPN server. They will only be able to see the IP address of the VPN server. That is why choosing a server in another country helps you get around geolocking for streaming services. If you need to log in to anywhere, they will still know it is you. They will just think you are somewhere you are not.

So yes, all these VPN services advertising increased privacy are selling snake-oil.

@domubpkm I don't use the private browsing feature in Morph. But what I understand is it will delete not only all cookies, but your history as well. If you run Morph in regular mode with this script, you can keep the cookies with sites you trust and all your history, too.

Using this script would be similar to the Manage Exceptions feature in the Firefox Security and Privacy settings. There you can “Allow” certain websites to leave cookies while you have ticked a checkbox “Delete cookies when Firefox is closed”.

So, you can login quicker with sites you trust and also quickly find that page you visited a couple days ago in your history.

@Bokkenn said in Clickable: C++ template does not work on Focal (20.04):

I forgot to specify the architecture.
Needless to say, adding --arch arm64 to the command fixed the problem. Sorry for taking your time for such a trivial issue.

Glad you got it sorted, although it is odd, as since a few versions --arch arm64 has been the default for clickable. Very odd indeed. Do you have setup somewhere in some configuration that amd64 should be the default on your development machine?

I believe it would be good to have some mechanism in place to warn me if I attempt to install a .click with the wrong architecture. It only said "failed to install" from the command line, and installing manually though the phone only gave an "incorrect package format" from the OpenStore.

Well, the 'failed to install' bit on the command line and especially the 'incorrect package format' that the OpenStore throws are the mechanisms I guess.

Now looking back at your original post, I see that the answer was staring us right in the face, in the name of the click: /home/phablet/appname.yourname_1.0.0_amd64.click.

I guess now we know.

@jonius said in Issues with clickable gdb / gdbserver:

@talkless please clean the build dir when switching between versions.

I do clean. What am I missing?

clickable clean --arch arm64 clickable clean --arch arm64 --libs clickable script prepare-deps --arch arm64 && clickable build --libs --arch arm64 && clickable build --arch arm64 --skip-review --release

Hi,
I tested this solution with a Mi A2 phone using latest focal version and it works fine. However, in my phone I had to add a 2 second sleep after bringing up the wg interface, and then I had to add again the routes to the wg network.

The contents of wgup.sh script are:

#!/bin/bash sudo wg-quick up wg0 sleep 2 sudo ip -4 route add 10.8.0.1/32 dev wg0 sudo ip -4 route add 10.8.0.0/24 dev wg0 exit

The wg kernel module is already enabled for this phone, as this command shows:

cat /sys/module/wireguard/version 1.0.20201112

As far as I know, QQC1 isn't available in UT Only QQC2. Also, file dialog isn't what works in UT. You'll have to use ContentHub

@wendor The issue was that clickable still defaults to ubuntu-sdk-framework-16.04, while your device is running 20.04. That was causing the error messages you were seeing.

@chris_bavaria said in Share address from contacts to uNav:

@lduboeuf said in Share address from contacts to uNav:

Not possible afaik

Ok I understand. Thanks.
Maybe someday there will be a solution for this?

Yes, should not be hard. Please file an issue here: https://gitlab.com/ubports/development/core/address-book-app

@aarontheissueguy Bear in mind that this how-to might contain some steps that are no longer necessary. Installing Qt 5 for instance is not needed. Clickable downloads the requisite container images with everything installed necessary for the tutorial.

@josele13 Jami is already taking care of it 🙂

I figured out a good base to start with.

Inside of the main QML, start with:

import QtQuick
import QtQuick.Window
import QtWebEngine

Window {
width: 1024
height: 750
visible: true
WebEngineView {
anchors.fill: parent
url: "https://www.qt.io"
}
}

Found here:
https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qtwebengine-webenginequick-minimal-example.html

@kugiigi thanks it slipped my mind i knew it used QT i was just having a moment lol yeah in my experience with things like that it should be updatable cause it should bring all the old api and then some new ones however my experience with QT is quite limited now i wonder?

are the packages shipped with the click, or on the device - if installed on the root of the device maybe the click would need to be unconfined?

@utuser said in Changing the default version of qtcreator for Clickable:

Is my setup the current standard and recommendation in UT app developement then?

There is no "standard' in UT app development. clickable is a very convenient option, but not everyone uses the ide option. I for instance use VSCodium as an editor. I find QtCreator has too many options I never use.
Others use Atom or Vi or Nano as code editors. A handful of developers don't even use clickable.

Feel free to try QtCreator via clickable ide. If it works for you, then that is the right tool.

No idea about intents but I guess its equivalent would be content hub and URI handling. They're far from being robust but that's all we have now 😄