Posts made by developerbayman

@andreij-98 no not currently

oh one more thing i could also do things like "recovery ninja" a background service that would detect a state change in a file system .....if something got broken it would compare to the original and automatically restore the files inform the user they broke it but it automatically fixed it .....while still allowing people to fiddle around (people do want to fiddle) .....if done properly my ideas could be used to reinforce UT's security mind approach .......but i do have to admit one super flaw in all of my pining .....im on a xaiomi redmi note 9 pro .....so im a little blind to the resource limitations of other devices ......im going to endeavor to compile UT for my device ill set up a test case version using my device ....ill make changes to present to the community and if yall like it you can adopt it or not .....in the end this would probably be the best way to go about it and please everyone (myself included)

@AppLee thank you

@arubislander said in Connection problem pip3:

@developerbayman We have heard of this fabled solution, yes. But up to now have not seen a reproducible instance of it in action, unfortunately.

i think i have a game plan but i have to do some studying ....right now my primary linux distro just nuked the bootloader on a system update ....so now im going to have to deal with that nightmare before i even get back to reinstalling clickable ......last 2 times i installed clickable it was automatically broken do to some library breakage at some point so it was unusable and i havent been able to track down the issue yet ....maybe by now it solved itself? idk

@arubislander ....i would like to apologize if i come off as annoying or rude ......im just passionate about creation and making things cool/fun to use ect .....ubuntu touch would be a beautiful environment to enact my art into ....and the barriers in front of me leaves me a little disappointed/crest fallen .....im going to change my tactics as i understand pestering you good people isnt helping .....it is what it is

and true some things can be put into a clickable ....but alot of things cannot

another example does UT have a disk usage application? without system level access and 3rd party lib support i cannot bring this to UT this also uses a mobile UI and could easily be tweak for small screens ....i can go on and on with these examples so surly you understand my frustration? everything from media players to office suite i have and as i stated in my previous post in off topic ....most of this software while im using in my own distro i designed it with UT in the back of my mind .....maybe these are terrible examples? ........idk man all i know is i would like to make it a even better user experience but the current framework does not allow me to shine

I understand your intentions, but when you write "lets bring full python support to UT", I read "lets replace Ubuntu Touch by something very different"<

not at all actually like you said python is already there the issue in its current form is it cannot load 3rd party libs this makes it only functional in the sense it behaves as a very basic scripting agent ....for example this would allow push button service control and is in fact using a mobile lib (just does not look that way im testing on a desktop) this would be a handy thing instead of typing terminal commands on a touch screen but would require system level access ....i seek not to change UT but to enhance it this is a minor example and maybe not even a wanted feature im just trying to show what im mean

@AppLee there is the possibility of running venv environment inside of a clickable ......but im not sure how much of that would work or not work

i have browser i made (screenshots offtopic thank you post) when i wake up ill convert to mobile it can do drm content download manager video downloader and page source code viewer ....as a desktop app it weighs 11kb while running youtube and facebook uses around 200 mb ram +- .....i must sleep now ......i have good rebuttals to all of your concerns and breaking containerization isnt the goal ......but i will come back to this when i can string my thoughts together better and explain .....mobile in python is super easy and lightweight (usually)

lol im turning into a record .....insert prattle here as it applies as well ....

@developerbayman ......i hate to play this card ....but im gonna ....while i totally do not know everything .....i have been a software dev for over 35 years ......in some things i really do know what im talking about ....and i promise everything i prattle on about is only for the benefit of this project

@Moem true ....but no pressure implied all i ask is a long step back and thoughtful introspection ......if i can convince UT to open like 2 doors for me ....i could light a new application wave of fire bringing unpresented application features and functionalities ....did you see my thank you post in off topic? ......all i would need to do is change initial screen size for alot of the applications

@arubislander i have not but im curious ill have to check it out! very cool .......lol but my sights are on UT .....i know droidian and possibly rhino linux? and maybe a few others are there and in alot of cases closer to my ideology ......however they all seem to lack one thing (hyperbole many things are missing lol) ........you they all lack you and the rest of this community .......unlike all these other stupid mobile os projects .......you guys made me fall in love with you ....i would like to see UT thrive because of that .....your kindness earned my love .....even if i think the current UT design is a little ass-nine .........true love conquers all eh?

i like this community alot better than droidians ......1 of 2 things will eventually happen 1.)ill talk everyone into giving me what i want 2.) eventually ill compile it myself and get what i want anyways (compiling linux and editing it before hand is new to me so i must level up to do it) ....... i nag because i care

im willing to bet my left testicle if UBports followed my advice on this this project would do a total 180 and device ports would explode following the first release of a public announced reworked UT ......and so far one of the BEST things UT has going for it i dont seem to hear alot about but i noticed ....UT automatically ops out of the scam of force subscription for example i can still listen to youtube music while on lock screen without a subscription ....i really like that

ubports does not have the money or manpower to reinvent the wheel ......build on the back of giants its what they are for ....like the whole point of open source ....which it seems like alot needs to be re-ported to UT because someone wants to reinvent the wheel .....my mind is officially blown ......i know its possible because what they are doing with droidian ....(dont get me wrong droidian is its own set of logistical nightmares for other reasons ....and why im back pestering you good folks)

this is another example of what i find the most confounding about ubuntu touch "break everything to go in a undefined secure direction and reinventing the wheel to do it" ....im not complaining just an observation .....other than the mobile desktop environment being tailored for mobile (and here would be the checks and balances to guide UT in the secure vision that is has ....whatever that may be) but in the underbelly keep it as close to standard ubuntu linux as possible do to the fact everything would work as intended (at least alot more so anyways) then things like clickable and libertine would be seen as a bonus as a app standard to (which it already is but its forced and has very ...very little support) ....and a virtual machine for developers or say government workers that need that kind of level of security or test cases ......i just dont understand it

@uxes i may if it does not get moved but i feel its a too serious of a proposal (at least for me anyway)

@arubislander was apt totally dropped?