in my opinion, the Android one is the worst interface for the settings (but also the IoS interface is no joke). It does not need to slide to the right or left obligatorily. The beauty of UT is that if you pull down the curtain from the network indicator, you will have all the network settings, if you pull down from the battery, you will have the battery settings and so on.
In Android, you have to a) open the interface, b) select and / or long press to open the settings. Much less intuitive and fast. IMHO

in framagit version 0.0.7 has been released which fixes many small bugs. Does anyone know how much time passes for the release of the new version on the Openstore?

It seems to me an interesting project and with excellent potential. I reported some error on Framagit.
Thanks for the excellent work you do.

You preceded me by a few seconds! I was just about to post: "what do you think of ...."

To read and make QR Code you can use Tagger --> https://open.uappexplorer.com/app/com.ubuntu.developer.mzanetti.tagger

If you hav a problem, try Pesbuk. i'm using this app and it's ok!

@dobey I think that the concept of being able to do as much as possible with one hand is correct. This does not rule out that it can still use two hands.
It would also be useful to have a "right-handed" or "left-handed" function that speculatively overturns the UI.

@Aury88 2.5 for me.

@pulsar33 I use Pesbuk too and messages work fine!

Gabriele from Livorno (Italy)

I restarted the phone and - now - it seems to work all regularly .... It is certainly a strange thing ...

@advocatux Yes.
My problem does not concern the alarms but an incorrect display of the time between the initial screen (plus upper bar) and Clock. I did not try, though, if the clock alarm refers to one or the other time

@advocatux
italian.

Report this serious problem that also affects the alarm

https://github.com/ubports/ubuntu-touch/issues/1024

@glocester Nice! I like it.

@domubpkm
same for me. Changing meteo channel, work fine.

@marathon2422 said in An idea for a different approach than the classic grid home.:

@giemme
That blank section at the bottom ,could be called "RETIRED " and all it needs is a big "snooze" button

The empty section at the bottom is only because I chose a "bar" theme and I added 4 bands (but in reality I could create less)

@dobey
I understand your point of view. I have two clarifications to make: the first is that the categories are not "preset" but customizable (trivially, I could also have a universe only "family"). For everything else, I can always count on the shortcuts on the left bar.
The second is that Universe, as I see it, is a sort of "scope", in the sense that it is an aggregator. The "grid" of the app would still exist.
For the "technical" part I do not know if it is complicated or not to add a layer that pre-sets the opening settings. In fact, however, this would serve only for some apps (typically social, e-mail, address book and little else). But, apart from social networks, the rest is "homemade" (Telegram, Dekko2, Contacts, Camera, Gallery, etc., that can be built "sartorially" by the community) would remain outside Facebook, Whatsapp and little else that do not already develop for UT. All the rest of the apps can remain exactly the same and be inserted as simple links in one or more universe. IMHO

a simple example (made quickly and with little precision)