UBports Robot Logo UBports Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. gpatel-fr
    3. Best
    G
    Online
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 1
    • Posts 55
    • Groups 0

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: We Drop Ubuntu Touch Entirely

      @grenudi said in We Drop Ubuntu Touch Entirely:

      500+ device ports versus Ubuntu Touch's approximately 50

      uh? I am currently evaluating my options on getting a so called 'smart' phone again without Google and of course Apple, and from what I see PostmarketOS has ONE (1) device that can (more or less) qualify as 'daily driver': the Pinephone. Not sure if it's even compatible with the carriers in MY country.
      My understanding is that UT has about 10.
      From this point of view, UT has more coverage but if you have lot of credible stories of people using Volla or Google or Fairphone or Samsung devices under PostmarketOS as their daily drivers, I am all ears.
      By the way your expletives about the forum are making you seem like a troll. Sorry but that's very much what it looks. This forum is working really well and I'm favourably impressed by NodeBB.

      posted in OS
      G
      gpatel-fr
    • RE: Why is Wayland compositor and Lomiri so far in terms of functionality compared to Compiz and Unity7 released some 20 years ago?

      @shano said in Why is Wayland compositor and Lomiri so far in terms of functionality compared to Compiz and Unity7 released some 20 years ago?:

      Compiz was released in 2006 and is still maintained. Unity7 was released in 2010 and is still maintained. My question is why Wayland and Lomiri are so far away in terms of functionality, plugins etc. compared to tech made 20 years ago.

      Are we building on top or reinventing the wheel?

      From what I see, Lomiri is not reinventing Unity 8, it is Unity 8.
      I downloaded the Lomiri source code and counted roughly 18000 commits between 2013 and 2017 (end of Ubuntu involvement) and 1400 commits between 2018 and 2025. The main reason is probably that Unity was a business project with serious resources behind it, while Lomiri (the new name for Unity 8 since 2020) is an open source project with a few part time volunteers. Also, it may be that there was so much work in Unity that there is not a lot of new development necessary, the bulk of new work being in other parts of the full (and huge) smart phone stack. I did not count but I think that a large part of these 1400 commits are just translations.

      I don't know Compiz but I tracked the project in its last hideout on Gitlab and counted about 30 commits in last 5 years, 20 of them in 2020. It's maintained in the most limited sense, there is almost no development.

      posted in Lomiri (was Unity8)
      G
      gpatel-fr
    • RE: New ConverseJS (XMPP) app with broken source links?

      @poVoq

      hello, not the dev here - but the links are not broken for me. The app is supposed to be based on

      https://github.com/luigi311/ConverseJS-ubports

      the links are a bit strange though (why not a software forge ? if the author don't like Github, there are other such as codeberg...). It's not stated in the original repo that the author has given up. Personally I'd not use this software without more information.

      posted in App Development
      G
      gpatel-fr
    • RE: Status of the Location Service (GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo) ?

      @Moem said in Status of the Location Service (GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo) ?:

      I don't know what any of that means

      it's a service provided by Qualcomm

      https://calyxos.org/docs/guide/security/network-activity/

      http://izatcloud.net/

      See an analysis here:

      https://ti.qianxin.com/blog/articles/Analysis-of-the-Hidden-Backdoor-Event-in-Qualcomm-GPS-Service-EN/

      TLDR: backdoor is too strong a word, but there are privacies issues. If the software is rewritten as open source, this could be less problematic.

      posted in Fairphone 4
      G
      gpatel-fr
    • RE: We Drop Ubuntu Touch Entirely

      @t12392n said in We Drop Ubuntu Touch Entirely:

      atm I cannot use it as a daily...

      hmm, is it about Volte or your bank don't like Waydroid ? if the latter, it's not quite entirely the OS fault's.

      posted in OS
      G
      gpatel-fr
    • RE: calls and internet

      @Linuxlite76 said in calls and internet:

      my mobile date will not work at all

      I assume that you wanted to write 'my mobile data', so your meaning is that you can't for example surf on the net with Morph right ? if yes, is cellular data disabled in the settings ? and if you open a shell, can you ping for example 1.1.1.1 and if not is there any change in the output of 'ip a' and 'route -n' before and after the problem ?

      posted in Support
      G
      gpatel-fr
    • RE: Status of the Location Service (GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo) ?

      @adorsaz

      I have tried it on a FP5 and got absolutely nowhere - nothing at all. Got sidetracked by other problems.

      I have seen in one Gitlab issue that for some configuration (did not take any bookmark) someone got a resolution speed that could be compared to Android. So it seems that something good is possible when stars are aligned.
      Also, from what I understand, A-GPS is something fundamentally different from other Gps services; these services rely on different satellite networks, while A-GPS is software Gps, using existing servers that have Gps coordinates to complete the localization, allowing it to get a result faster still.
      I remember having seen on another Gitlab post that some work had started on A-GPS; as I have not seen any announce (that I could have missed of course), I tend to think it's not yet a thing.

      posted in Fairphone 4
      G
      gpatel-fr
    • RE: Potentially turning a negative of Google's tightening restrictions into a positave

      @t12392n

      thanks for the explanation.
      I wonder how disabled people (the ones that may have trouble using a terminal as small as a phone) fares in this scheme.

      Also, unfortunately for Linux devices such as Ubuntu Touch, betting all on a device that has a gigantic attack surface - the smartphone has typically 3 open connections (radio, wifi, bluetooth) and connects to typically one software store with many apps, with automatic update turned on for everything - pretty well ensures that only systems provided by big Daddy Google or big Daddy Apple will be considered secure enough for general use by a population not especially well versed in security. I am going to get a device that will get UT next week but I'm not keen on doing banking on it. Using old kernel and old binary drivers don't seem to be a good thing with so dangerously exposed devices.

      posted in General
      G
      gpatel-fr
    • RE: We Drop Ubuntu Touch Entirely

      @t12392n said in We Drop Ubuntu Touch Entirely:

      1Password

      it seems that the provider of this software already provides a snap for x86, so maybe you could try to ask them if they could build it for ARM64 ? or even try to search the snap store in the unlikely case where they had already done the job but not yet updated their web site ?

      posted in OS
      G
      gpatel-fr
    • RE: Call for testing: Ubuntu Touch 24.04-1.1

      @johndoe said in Call for testing: Ubuntu Touch 24.04-1.1:

      The stable channel is usually the one you want as the end user

      stable was the first installation I did, and I switched deliberately to daily to see if any of the problems I noticed on stable would be fixed.

      posted in OS
      G
      gpatel-fr