Forum wide moderators
As long as everything it generated was open source, so it could be reviewed.
Otherwise, unsafe.
The problem is, that there is no way to tell. We don't know what the AI was trained on. So we can't know if what it reproduces is in violation of any licenses, proprietary or otherwise.
@Bolly Not harsh at all. But we had to go through the process of warning the user and seeing where things went. Where they went warranted intervention. The situation has now been dealt with and we have posted our stance on the matter going forwards.
On this forum we would like to foster open, friendly, fair and human interaction. Recently however long posts have been made by humans consisting mostly, if not completely, of AI generated analyses and conclusions. The expressed desire was for the community to engage with the analyses and confirm or refute the conclusions. We deem this to be unacceptable.
Everyone is free to use the tools they want to. However we would like to keep this space an interaction between humans. You may well use an LLM to translate posts or to digest and summarize a great deal of information. But please don't ask it for its opinion on the matter, and if you do, by all means do not copy past its analysis and opinion here. Read the summary and come to your own conclusions based on that. If you feel strongly about them, share them, the conclusions, your conclusions.
Going forward, anyone found to be posting AI analysis and conclusions, those posts will be deleted, and the user will receive one (1) warning. If the user persists then they will be banned.
Thank you for understanding.
